Statement on Nobel's Peace Prize and TFF receives the People's Nobel Peace Prize

By Jan Oberg

Here first the important statement by seminar participants (in Swedish below):

The Nobel Peace Prize must not be misused

A Nordic seminar at Orust (Sweden) about the Nobel Peace Prize has analysed the Norwegian Nobel Committee’s selection of awardees over time. Lead by former Prime Minister Torbjørn Jagland, it has awarded the prize to e.g. Wangari Maathai, Al Gore, Shirin Ebadi, Liu Xiabo, Barack Obama and institutions such as the European Union (EU).

The mentioned personalities have undoubtedly contributed in various ways to a better future of the world but they have not met the criteria which Alfred Nobel formulated in his will, namely:

• Active struggle for the abolition or reduction of standing armies
• Contributing to the fraternity among nations
• Creation of negotiations/dialogues aiming at peace and congresses for peace
• Resilience as ”fredsförfäktare” – champions of peace.

This unambiguous anti-militarist mandate is strongly contradicted by the selection of the European Union since the EU in its Lisbon Treaty commits the member states to steadily improve their military capacity and develop a common weapons industry. The Union does not have a single peace academy while it has dozens of military academies.

We, participants in this Nordic seminar at Orust, are of the opinion that the Norwegian Nobel Commitee in the future shall be composed of personalities who together are competent in the many areas of peace.

Further, as participants we consider it of utmost importance that the Swedish Nobel Foundation exercises control, in its role as administrator of Nobel’s donation, and ensures that the provisions of Nobel’s will are adhered to and that it carry out its duties in a way that guarantees that the Norwegian Nobel Committee awards the Prize only to persons and institutions who meet the specific and very clear criteria.



Finally, we appeal to the media to investigate the authorities of the Regional Board (Länsstyrelse) and other relevant legal bodies as to whether or not they live up to their duty to exercise control of the adherence to the will.

Stocken at Orust, Sweden, December 7, 2013


According to the decision of the meeting participants

Ola Friholt

Chair, the Peace Association at Orust.
Torget 1, Stocken, SE – 47492 Ellös

Phone 0046 304 51215
ola.friholt@gmail.com

The seminar ended in a ceremony at which TFF and its founders, Jan Oberg and Christina Spannar, were awarded the People’s Nobel Peace Prize 2013, followed by an exquisite Nobel dinner created by the Association’s member and on the basis of local raw materials only.

– “It was such a rich day, so much intellectual and political commitment, public education and then this heart-warming gesture,” says Jan Oberg. “I have often stated and do so gladly again that the Orust Association for Peace is the best in Scandinavia because of its use of a very broad approach to peace and it’s systematic pro-peace orientation. Its amazing leaders, Erni and Ola Friholt, their Board members and other members performs as one large family and we always feel conviviality, happiness and civil courage in abundance.”

– “And while the Prize is a beautiful text in granite accompanied by a document but not a sum of money, the greatness about this People’s Nobel Peace Prize is that it is awarded by people who know what peace is – in contrast to the Norwegian Nobel Committee members. This Prize is a wonderful reward for what TFF has done over 28 years, yes – but it is also a tremendous energy booster towards what we will continue to do. Be sure of that!” – ends TFF’s director.

Seminar participants who formulated the statement
Tomas Magnusson, left, and Ola Friholt making presentation about the Nobel Peace Prize
The People's Nobel Peace Prize 2013
The Nobel Dinner starts

NOBELS FREDSPRIS FÅR EJ MISSBRUKAS!

Ett nordiskt seminarium på Orust om Nobels fredspris har behandlat den norska Nobelkommitténs val av pristagare under lång tid. Under den nuvarande kommittén, som leds av förre statsministern Torbjörn Jagland, har priset givits t ex till Wangari Maathai, Al Gore, Shirin Ebadi, Liu Xiaobo, Barack Obama och institutioner som EU.

De nämnda personerna har förvisso gjort mycket gott för en bättre framtid i världen men har inte alls uppfyllt de specifika villkor Alfred Nobel ställt upp i sitt testamente, nämligen:

• aktiv kamp för nedrustning (t ex minskning av stående arméer),
• insatser för förbrödring mellan folken,
• skapande av förhandling/dialog syftande till fred/fredskongresser, och
• uthållighet som ”fredsförfäktare”.

Detta entydigt antimilitaristiska mandat motsägs dramatiskt i valet av EU, eftersom EU i sin grundlag, det s k Lissabonfördraget, ålägger medlemsstaterna att ”förbättra sin militära kapacitet” och dessutom utveckla en gemensam vapenproduktion. EU har inte en enda fredsakademi men dussintals militärakademier.

Vi deltagare i det nordiska seminariet på Orust anser att den norska Nobelkommittén i fortsättningen skall bestå av personer med kompetens på fredens många områden.

Vi deltagare anser det också ytterst angeläget att tillsyn utövas över att den svenska Nobelstiftelsen som förvaltare av Nobels donationer följer föreskrifterna i Nobels testamente och fullgör sin skyldighet att säkerställa att den norska Nobelkommittén ger priset till personer och institutioner som uppfyller Nobels specifika och tydliga villkor. Vi uppmanar media att undersöka om länsstyrelse och kammarkollegium fullgör sin skyldighet att utöva kontroll.

Stocken på Orust, den 7 december 2013
enligt mötets uppdrag

Ola Friholt
Ordförande i Fredsrörelsen på Orust, arrangör.

Torget 1, Stocken, SE – 47492 Ellös
Tel 0304-51215
ola.friholt@gmail.com

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...