Militarising space is quite unnecessary

LONDON – Space shoots off in all directions, and so it seems does U.S. Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, a long time aficionado of the subject. But not for him the dreamy, floating hotels of Richard Branson’s imagination. Rumsfeld’s intentions are on a grander, more intimidating, scale: to ensure that the U.S. militarily dominate not just the terrain of earth, not only the mighty ocean depths and the skies above but also the deep indigo of the weightless world beyond, and in so doing confirm in heavenly spades that no one will ever pull a fast one on the U.S., coming at it from the vast unknown.

After 22 years of work and $100 billion spent, and with the Pentagon still admitting that from an earth-based launch pad it cannot reliably destroy the threat of an incoming ballistic missile, it is difficult not to be amazed that the U.S. should want to up the technological and financial ante in this way. European diplomats are incredulous at the Pentagon’s sense of timing- to let this story come out just when the U.S. in engaged in delicate negotiations at the current review conference of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to try and persuade the world that the U.S. is truly interested in limiting the means of warfare. A senior Russian diplomat has said that if the U.S. goes ahead with this project Russia would have to react, possibly using force.

During the time of the Clinton Administration, Rumsfeld chaired two important commissions. The first, now well known, concluded that the threat of a ballistic missile attack was “evolving more rapidly” than had previously been thought. The second, which received much less press notice, was that the U.S. some day might face a “Space Pearl Harbor” with a sneak attack on all America’s precious communication satellites orbiting the earth. Space warfare had become “a virtual certainty”, Rumsfeld said at the time.

In his early days in office Rumsfeld argued publicly that the U.S. must develop “power projection in, from, and through space.” Then the issue dropped out of sight until last week’s reports. Naively perhaps, some of us had thought Rumsfeld, forced to do his sums in the era of the vast budget deficit, had come down to earth. Not a bit of it.

Space war has been a recurrent political theme since the fright America got when the Soviet Union launched its Sputnik in 1957. President Lyndon Johnson, not long after, said, “Out in space, there is the ultimate position- from which total control of the earth may be exercised”. President Ronald Reagan launched his Strategic Defense Initiative, the so-called “star wars”, meant to deploy space-based weapons to shoot down incoming missiles. He found his way blocked by a Democratic Congress.

But Reagan’s notion pales besides that of Rumsfeld’s. Rumsfeld has always talked of the need for America’s total domination of space. It must be large enough and so all encompassing, argued his report, that any counter measures by other countries would be quickly nullified.

This is the ultimate in American unilateralism. It will not only make enemies where they don’t exist, it will make friends in NATO wonder if they will be pressed to make up the alliance’s inevitable shortfall in more run-of-the-mill programs whilst American indulges itself in its space fantasies.

The Cold War with Russia is supposed to be over. China is presumed not to be an enemy. Israel, India and Pakistan are friends. So who is going to go behind America’s back and get organized for space warfare if America sits on its hands? As for North Korea and Iran why would they want, even if they could, to launch a nuclear missile attack on the U.S. when they would meet devastating retaliation? If anyone wants to do a nuclear 9/11 they will carry it in in a suitcase or run it in in a small boat or plane.

As for the offensive use of space, what is the point of such over-kill when all it adds is extra speed to the way the U.S. can bomb an enemy? Not one country is even attempting to match America’s overwhelming firepower as it now is. Russia has given up and China’s out of area programne remains very modest.

“Man’s reach must exceed his grasp, or what is heaven for?” wrote Robert Browning. But not in his wildest poetic imagination could he have imagined that a new earthly empire at the onset of the third millennium, full of its conquest of the Soviet Union and European communism, would be eyeing the total military control of space to ensure that no would-be enemy- one that everyone else believes doesn’t exist- would be out to creep up on America in the far beyond. But, it seems, it “doth work like madness in the brain” of Secretary Rumsfeld.

Foreign affairs columnist, film-maker and author

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...