"For the Children of the World"

The Appeal of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates

Peace!

If the Third Millennium could begin under the sign of non-violence… It’s the dream of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates. They invite you to join them to influnece all governments of the planet.

The Appeal of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD”To Heads of States of all member states
of the General Assembly of the
United Nations.



Today, in every country throughout the world, there are many children silently suffering the effects and consequences of violence.

This violence takes many different forms: between children on the streets, at school, in family life and in the community. There is physical violence, psychological violence, socio-economic violence, environmental violence and political violence. Many children – too many children – live in a “culture of violence”.

We wish to contribute to reduce their suffering. We believe that each child can discover, by himself, that violence is not inevitable. We can offer hope, not only to the children of the world, but to all of humanity, by beginning to create, and build, a new Culture of Non-Violence.

For this reason, we address this solemn appeal to all Heads of States, of all member countries of the General Assembly of the United Nations, for the UN General Assembly to declare:

That the first decade of the new millennium, the years 2000-2010, be declared the “Decade for a Culture of Non-Violence”;

That at the start of the decade the year 2000 be declared the “Year of Education for Non-Violence”;

That non-violence be taught at every level in our societies during this decade, to make the children of the world aware of the real, practical meaning and benefits of non-violence in their daily lives, in order to reduce the violence, and consequent suffering, perpetrated against them and humanity in general.

Together, we can build a new culture of non-violence for humankind which will give hope to all humanity, and in particular, to the children of our world.With deepest respect,

The Nobel Peace Prize LaureatesSigned by

Mairead Maguire Corrigan,
Nelson Mandela,
Mother Teresa,
Aung San Suu Kyi,
The 14th Dalaï Lama (Tenzin Gyatso),
Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev,
Shimon Péres,
Elie Wiesel,
Mgr. Desmond Mpilo Tutu,
Adolfo Pérez Esquivel,
Yasser Arafat,
Mgr Carlos Felipe Ximenes Belo,
José Ramos-Horta,
Norman Borlaug,
Oscar Arias Sanchez,
UNICEF,
Frederik Willem de Klerk,
Betty Williams,
Lech Walesa,
Joseph Rotblat.

Why was this Appeal made ?
The conflicts of the second half of this 20th century with the devastating power of their atomic and chemical weapons have shown that the human species and its environment are under threat of extinction. Violence, under so many forms, has invaded human society.

It is therefore urgent to do everything in our power, with determination and tenacity, to reverse the processes which have made our 20th century the scene of the greatest carnage in history.

We will transmit to the children of the third millenium the wonders of our technology, with its promises of progress in all of Life’s spheres.But our legacy is also our sick planet, global economic war in our global economic village, a human family – broken and confused – worshipping before the altar of the Free Market.

If we are to escape from the ever-increasing threat of famines, war, poverty, exclusion and ecological catastrophees, then our children must acquire the wisdom that we lack.

This aim of Appeal is not senseless dramatisation. The aim of the Appeal is to bring people together to reflect, in the simplest of terms, on the future we want to build for ourselves and our children. Never in human history has mankind disposed so much power to transform himself and his world, the possibilities for creating a better life and a healthier environment – or – of destroying it all.

Life is permanent transformation by organic processes.

If we, as human beings, do not – at long last – sincerely opt for Peace, and give ourselves the means to achieve Peace through non-violence, then we will have opted for extinction. But Peace is not an inborn reflex. It is something to be accquired, learnt, merited.

We believe that it is our duty to participate in the eclosion of a peace generation. Our duty also to invite our children, and – through them – future generations, to avoid our own errors, and break free from the suicidal culture of violence that we live in. It is our duty to help them become aware of the possible alternatives, so that they may live in self-respect, at peace with their consciences, at peace with their world.

How the Appeal started
The first person to express the idea that non-violence should be taught to children at school was Thich Nhat Hanh (1).

Mme Marie-Pierre Bovy, president of IFOR (2) and member of a community founded by Lanza de Vasto, suggested during a community meeting in 1996 that there should be a “Year of Non-Violence.” Mr Pierre Marchand, founder of the humanitarian organisation “Partage avec les Enfants du Monde” 24 years ago, and IFOR delegate to the UNESCO in the Culture for Peace programme, decided to take up that challenge by launching a world-wide campaign.

Pierre Marchand met with the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Mairead Corrigan-Maguire, in Belfast and she agreed to lead the campaign. A generous donor, who has asked to remain anonymous, met the cost of these initiatives. Sri Loganathan, one of the leaders of the Gandhian movement and friend of Vinoba Bhavé, proposed that children should be taught about non-violence in kindergarten. The text of the appeal was written in a Children’s Village in India by Pierre Marchand.

From there, Pierre Marchand went on to Calcutta where Mother Teresa, recovering from her latest operation, signed the appeal in her hospital bed.

The third Nobel Peace Prize laureate to sign was Aung San Suu Kyi during a long discussion with Pierre Marchand in her Rangoon home – under the close surveillance.

Mairead Corrigan-Maguire and Pierre Marchand were then received in Washington by many dignataries, including the Dalai Lama, and by Mrs Sorensen – at the UN headquarters.

Mr Federico Mayor – Director General of UNESCO, Mrs Carol Belamy – Director General of UNICEF and Mrs Hildegard Goss-Mayr – Chairwoman of IFOR, have since signed letters in support of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate’s Appeal.

In a word – the consensus was there from the start. Today all the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates have signed the Appeal, (with the exception of two who we were unable to contact.)

At the end of May 1997, a letter was sent to all Heads of States to inform them of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate’s Appeal and their Proposed Resolution (text included below).

The General Assembly of the United Nations should be able to examine this text during the next session in October 1997.If, as we hope, this resolution is adopted we will have made but the first step. Then the real work will begin: to transform the best intentions of the world’s governments into concrete measures.As we stated earlier, education is the key factor. Education nourishes Culture. It is an interactive process which starts at the earliest instants of life.We already know that we can count on the support of several hundred organisations throughout the world to help us start programmes adapted to the culture and living conditions of children, young people and adults.

Among these organisations ready to help are the Serpaj in Latin America, The Peace People in Ireland, the Mouvement Social in Lebanon, Compartir in Lebanon, ASSEFA in India, The House of Grace in Israël, Milijuli in Nepal and most of all – IFOR.

Founded in 1915, IFOR was the first organisation for education in Non-Violence. IFOR has branches in over forty countries and brings together thousands of men and women committed to Non-Violence. IFOR’s role will be to co-ordinate the neccesary measures with governmental and non-governmental organisations, teachers, artists .. throughout the World.

1.UNESCO and UNICEF have agreed to integrate the spirit and the objectives of this Appeal into their programmes.Ex-president of the World Conference of Religion for Peace, Doyen of Van Anh University, author of seventy five books, Thich Nhat Hanh was proposed by Martin Luther King for the Nobel Peace Prize.

2.IFOR: The International Fellowship of Reconciliation, (Movement international de la réconciliation), has consultative status at the UN.

PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS

In response to the “Appeal for the Children of the World”, addressed by Nobel Peace Prize Laureates to each Head of the Member-States of the United Nations from Bethlehem in May 1997;

Recognising the reality of the different forms of violence which inflict today suffering on countless numbers of children, and conscious of the fact that this violence can be transformed to free ourselves, in order to live and to behave without being the cause of suffering, with a deep respect for Life, for the duties, the rights and the dignity of every human being and – specifically – of each child;

Aware of the rich spiritual heritage of humanity, manifest in our different religious traditions, handed down from generation to generation since the dawn of consciousness in the human species, and

Aware of the need to live our lives according to this heritage, to live mindfully and to transmit this heritage carefully to future generations, for it is the basis of a non-violent and meaningful art of living all together;

Recalling that the aim of the United Nations is to promote harmony and reconciliation between all members of the human family, and with our environment;

Recalling that the mission of UNESCO is to promote Peace through Education, Science and Culture, particularly through the “Culture of Peace” programme;

Considering the spirit of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child, signed and ratified by almost all of the United Nations member states;

Considering the Heads of State’s Summit and Action Plan for Children, convened in 1990 by UNICEF;

Recalling the Report of Mrs Graça Machel, in 1996, about the horrifying and unacceptable impact of armed conflict on children;

Recalling the constructive work done, since 1919, by all the members of the “International Fellowship of Reconciliation”, particularly with the Mahatma Gandhi and the Reverent Martin Luther King, to promote non-violence as a new way of living mindfully;

The Assembly General of the United Nations :

* Declares the decade 2000 – 2010 “The decade for a Culture of Non-Violence” ;

* Declares the year 2000 “The Year of Education for Non-Violence” ;

* Invites each member state to take the necessary steps so that Non-Violence be taught at every level in our societies during this decade, so that children become aware of the real, practical meaning and benefits of Non-Violence in their daily lives, in order to reduce the violence – and consequent suffering, perpetrated against them and humanity in general.

* Invites the president of the International Foundation “Appeal of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates : Share with the Children of the World” to deliver a report to the United Nations Secretary General on January 1st 2000, containing propositions for achieving these aims of mindful art of living, with the active support of the member states, the different organs of the United Nations and relevant N.G.O.s. as the “International Fellowship of Reconciliation”, the “Peace People” and “Servicio Paz y Justicia”.

This resolution involves no specific U.N.O. budget for it’s application. The International Foundation “Appeal of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates: Share with the Children of the World” calls upon individuals and collectivities (Nations, U.N. agencies, organisations, state enterprise and private companies, etc.) to share their resources, freely and willingly in order to build, all together with women and men of good will, without any discrimination of any kind and nobody left behind – specifically with all our children – a new way of life for all : A Culture of Non-Violence.

Letter of Support for the Appeal of The Nobel Peace Prize Laureates

I support the Appeal of The Nobel Peace Prize Laureates, so that The Year 2000 be named “The Year for the Education of Non-Violence”

The Years 2000 to 2010 be named “A Decade for The Culture of Non-Violence” so that education in Non-Violence may be taught and made available to all.

Title, Name and Firstname ____________________________________________

Full Address _______________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

Post /Zip Code _______________Country _______________________________

Profession______________________________________________ Age_______

Signature_________________________________________

By fax +33 3 44 86 39 07 or e-mail partage@wanadoo.fr

N.B. Please ask your friends and relatives to sign also; children can sign too.You can photocopy this page or copy it by hand on a sheet of paper.Please write clearly in capital letters your name and address so we can authenticate your signature.

This movement was started by committed individuals who prefer to keep it independent of any state intervention. This independence requires financial autonomy that in turn depends on private donations.

Any donations should be addressed to:

The Appeal of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates:
Sharing with the Children of the World
BP 20797
60207 Compiegne Cedex 2, France.
Fax + 33 (0)3 44.86.39.07
Internet: perso.wanadoo.fr/partage

Using either:

Our Post Office Bank Account (“CCP”) N° 42.207.77.S at La Source, France,

– or –

A Bank to Bank Transfer to our account in our local bank via l’Union des Banques in Paris, France. (UBP-France) using SWIFT DIRECT.
The Swift Code is: LUBPFRPP. Our local bank is the “Banque de Picardie – Compiègne – France”. Their ID number is : 30938 and our account with them is :0010-000130450.0042.

We thank you sincerely for your support !

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...