“NATO’s unwise, counterproductive and non-legalbombing of sovereign Yugoslavia is justified by PresidentBill Clinton, EU and other Western leaders and media withreference to humanitarian concerns. Supposedly air strikesserve to stop ethnic cleansing, future massacres, refugeeflows, and prevent innocent children and women from beingkilled. Diplomatically expressed, this comes from themarketing department. Bombings will to produce what itpurports to prevent,” says Dr. Jan Oberg, TFF’s director,right after the bombing campaign has started. According toOberg, this argument lacks credibility for the followingreasons: NO VIOLENCE-PREVENTIONWhy did the West do absolutely nothing before this crisisbecame violent? There were many opportunities for anegotiated solutions. TFF, for instance, has suggested avariety of options since 1992 that could have preventedviolence and the killing we’ve seen the last year. In noother conflict has there been so many early warnings and solittle preventive diplomacy. Kosovo’s catastrophe was amongthe most predictable of all. It is intellectual nonsensethat ‘everything else has been tried...