Amnesty International reaches deep into Africa's people

LONDON – We arrived at the king’s palace – not much more that a dilapidated corrugated iron-built structure- on the edge of the small town of Oyo, capital of the Yoruba kingdom that used to extend in pre-British days half way across the width of southern Nigeria and into Benin. Today, although it contains over 30 million people, it is a poor shadow of its former glory- power and wealth passed long ago to the bourgeoisie and- for a long period- to the army.

There was a salute by toothless old men, dressed in black, firing home made muskets. A succession of elderly men and women came and prostrated themselves full length before the king. A child dressed as an African carved doll danced. Pierre Sane, Amnesty International’s Secretary-General, dressed in the russet red robes of an honoury chief, knelt before the king who called him “one of the illustrious sons of Africa”. Then it was Sane’s turn to speak. The crowd of about 2,000 pressed closer to hear. “Amnesty International has reached deep into the heart of Africa”, he said, “deep beyond the cities of Africa, deep beyond the politicians of Africa, deep into the people of Africa.”

That indeed is the conclusion I’ve reached myself. An organization begun only 40 years ago by a Catholic English lawyer now has a million members around the world and is known- and appreciated- even in the back of beyond in darkest Africa.

For a week I have been accompanying around Nigeria a high level mission of Amnesty led by Mr Sane. Two days before, we arrived in Kaduna, the capital of the northern state of the same name. We drove along the burnt out streets- homes, small workshops, mosques and churches, almost side by side, gutted and charred. We climbed the steps up to the top floor of an old ramshackle building housing the Kaduna branch of Amnesty. Outside in the limp heat hung a banner with the Pepsi slogan affixed. “Kaduna Amnesty welcomes Pierre Sane”, it read. An elderly lady walked me to the balcony. “You see those large patches of discoloured tar on the road. That’s where they built bonfires and burnt people alive.” Christians and Muslims rioted in February and May over the planned introduction of traditional Islamic Sharia law. Perhaps as many as 1,000 people died.

Sane addressed a meeting of the local non-governmental organizations. The room was crowded and everyone wanted the chance to speak. Amazingly, nearly everyone was brief and to the point.

“The purpose of this meeting is quite enormous ” intoned the chairman in the heavy cadences of Nigerian English. “People have been burnt out and don’t have the where-with-all to rebuild. The state should compensate them”, said the first speaker. A Muslim from the Inter-Faith Mediation Centre said, “We Nigerians are notoriously religious. For most of the time, however, we respect each other. A few people used this freedom we have under democracy to stir things up.” “Why doesn’t the governor sweep the town for arms?” asked another. “After the Biafran war they went house to house and confiscated every gun and every bullet.”

We headed for the governor’s office. He is a Muslim, of course, and perhaps a tolerant man- there had been no effort to erase the graffiti scribbled on the outside of his office wall: “Sir, sorry to say, “NO” to Sharia”. We were ushered into a large conference room with microphones. Sane did a succinct job of summarising the criticisms of the non-governmental organisations and the governor an equally effective and swift job of rebutting them. “I was glad to see no nation, large as well as small, escaped criticism in your annual report- I saw it discussed on CNN”, the governor began. “We are introducing a form of neighborhood watch- drawn from various interest groups in each neighborhood. We’ll investigate that the nominees are responsible characters and then we’ll give them a monthly allowance. But we want them to be responsible not just for security but for the environment too.” Then he went on down through Sane’s check list: compensation- no but assistance; arms- we are looking for them; sharia- we can’t solve problems by fighting. We have to have a civilized dialogue.”

A couple of days before we had been in the office of President Olusegun Obasanjo, elected in a hotly contested election sixteen months ago. Obasanjo had been jailed by the military dictator, Sani Abacha, and Amnesty had campaigned vigorously for his release. In London he had paid a visit to Amnesty’s offices to say thank you. Yet, for all the warmth, it was not an easy meeting. Sane and his associates from the Nigerian branch of Amnesty had some tough things to say: “Why did the soldiers open fire during a protest in the Niger Delta? Why are women so dreadfully abused in prison. Why do the police still engage in extra-judicial executions of suspected criminals? Why is the death penalty still enforced?” Then for an hour Obasanjo took the bat and the ball, he ran, hit, ducked, lowered his voice, raised it, told anecdotes, knocked away any suggestions the Amnesty team made for review, reprimand or change, although, to be fair, he told them if they hear of any prisons where they practice torture to pass the information on to him.

On the crucial issue of the behaviour of the army he was, as Sane told him, “thinking as a soldier. You have to think of the morale of the army, yes, but you also have to think about the wrong things the army does.” “Have you ever been shot at, Pierre?”, countered the president, who in the war in Biafra thirty years ago was shot at many times. Sane shook his head modestly, although I know his life has been threatened a number of times. “Unfortunately”, joshed Obasanjo”, there’s nowhere here where we can send Pierre to be shot!”

The truth is the change for the better under Obasanjo is the difference between night and day. People feel free. Political discourse is open and vigorously so. No one is incarcerated for their political opinions. Amnesty has been an important part of that change and remains an important player in the changes that have to come if Nigeria is going to take its place, as Obasanjo desires, at the top table of the world’s most important democracies.

I can be reached by phone on +44385 351172 or by e-mail:JonatPower@aol.com

Foreign affairs columnist, film-maker and author

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...