State Terrorism / Terrorism, USA / Iraq, Israel / Palestine Right Now

johangaltung

[1]  When somebody declares “War on Terrorism” any counter-war should come as no surprise.  War is a two-way street as Anglo-Americans and Israelis with their punishment expeditions and military intervention against peoples unable to hit back are now learning. Today they hit back, military and civilians against military and civilians; USA-UK killing by far most. Terrorists possess less destructive force than the state terrorists, but their societies are more vulnerable.  Thus, a nonviolent Muslim strike in some of them will have a major impact.

[2]  This also applies to members of the “US-led coalition” with military deployment in Afghanistan and Iraq like Spain. The 11-M Madrid-Atocha atrocity is in this category although other issues handled badly by Spain like Ceuta-Melilla may play a role.  US stupidity has generalized a simple 9/11 attack to a real clash, including with Australian sex, also pedophile, tourism in Bali.

[3]  Spain is now making history, defying the US Empire by withdrawing troops (1,300), with Honduras (1,200).  Thailand, Portugal, Ukraine and Kazakhstan will not replace troops. South Korea, Poland, El Salvador, Bulgaria and Singapore have doubts. A coalition bought by spoils and fed with lies is unravelling, and more quickly so the more obvious the imminent defeat.  They will negotiate withdrawal against promise not to attack.

[4]  To correct a grave mistake, like joining the US Empire fight for oil control, geo-political goals of the Mackinder type (Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Eurasia. then the world) , and missionary activity, under pretexts like links to Al Qaeda and WMD (watch for US plants though), against 92% of Spain, in the name of Democracy, is not giving in to terrorism, nor a sign of being weak.  The weak person is incapable of rectifying mistakes and gives in to pressure.  The strong person changes his course.

[5]  USA and Israel live in a virtual reality, pretending they are only up against some special groups in Iraq and Palestine. Look at the map, look at history.  There has been in-fighting among Arabs and Muslims, but almost all borders between the 22 Arab and the 56 Muslim countries are established by Christian and one Jewish colonizer. US/Israel state terrorism reinforces the old idea of one Arab nation of more than 300 million, and one Islamic nation of more than 1,300 million from Casablanca to Mindanao.  The divisions in Islam are in time rather than space, between khalifats, dynasties.  The Crusades, with the Mongols, killed the Abassid dynasty in the Baghdad 1258 massacre. The khalifat movement is now growing again thanks to Bush & Co.

[6]  The present Crusade, with missionaries and bibles, even unifies Sunnis and Shia, Arab and non-Arab Muslims.  But Western unitary nation-states overestimate the cohesion inside countries like Iraq and Afghanistan, and underestimates the cohesion with other Arab/Islamic countries.  For both federations along Swiss, not US lines, with linguistic/religious borders, are meaningful; so are confederations with Arab and Muslim neighbor countries. What Christians do in the EU Arabs/Muslims might also like to do [7]  Iraqis and Palestinians with other Arabs and Muslims fight Anglo-American geo-fascism alone on behalf of the many dozens of countries intervened militarily by the US Empire.  With the US Empire causing that much killing and exploitation all over the world they are fighting on behalf of all of us, with major rise in the conversion to Islam in Africa and Asia, Europe and USA.

[8]  The peace movement, mainly in Christian countries, is long on critique, numbers, ritualistic marches and demos that impress no geo-fascist, and short on constructive alternatives and real struggle against the US Empire.  Hopefully civil society boycott of US consumer products (like colas, burgers and gasoline), capital goods (like Boeing aircraft for travel when there are alternatives; Boeing being a major death factory) and financial goods (dollars, stocks, bonds) is on the way. The average profit of a US company abroad is about 6% so not much boycott is needed.  Always to be combined with dialogue. We are fighting two fundamentalisms like we once fought two superpowers.

[9]  Many cling to the hope that US atrocities depends on Bush. But interventions, killing and exploitation is bipartisan, slightly higher under the Democrats as Republicans have been more “isolationist”.  The participation of John F. Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate, in “rebuking” Spain shows both lack of judgment and sharing of the imperial pursuit when he could have built a bridge to the nucleus of Europe. Of course this is Bush’ Vietnam as Edward Kennedy has pointed out.  But it would have been even better if he had voted against the war and  not left that essentially to the wonderful icon Barbara Lee.

[10]  Condi Rice complained that the intelligence contained no when, where and how of a 9/11 attack.  Ask what the USA has done in 240 interventions, and the  ask why. There is more to come.

[11]  The US project in Iraq is still-born in spite of a US deployment of 110,000 public and 18,000 privatized soldiers (“security civilians”) and the UK 8,700 UK; none of the others are reliable as defeat looms more clearly on the horizon.  Of course there may be lulls in the violence.  There is no Iraq to receive sovereignty, only a puppet regime, and what cannot be handed over because it can only come from the struggle of the Iraqis themselves will not be handed over anyhow, with the USA keeping an “embassy” with 5,000 employees in the “Green Zone”, 14 bases, and no plan to withdraw.  The war will continue.  30 June/1 July may become quite something.  These people fought centuries against the Ottomans and 40 years against UK regime.

[12]  The Israeli project in Palestine is also still-born. State terrorism, even targeted on religious leaders by the Israeli militarocracy, is a formula for collective Israeli suicide.

[13]  The TRANSCEND list of alternatives includes:

–  Conference for Security and Cooperation in the Middle East, CSCME

–  Iraq possibly as a federation, with a capital outside Baghdad

–  UN-led reconstruction/development

–  UN-led peacekeeping; all coalition troops out

–  A major role for the Organization of the Islamic Conference, OIC

–  Confederated Kurdish autonomies in Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Syria

–  A 6-country Middle East Community, MEC: Syria, Lebanon, Palestine     (242 and 338), Israel, Jordan and Egypt, with the EC as a model.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...