How Governments and Citizens Can Stop the Trump Regime’s World-Threatening Designs

AI created illustration after an idea by Jan Oberg – the EU flag in the right background

Introduction to TFF’s forthcoming four Idea Portfolios of Diplomatic and Nonviolent Resistance

By TFF’s Board & Founders
Pascal Lottaz, Biljana Vankovska, Annette Schiffmann, Christina Spannar & Jan Oberg

January 19, 2026

“America, you are too arrogant.”

— Martin Luther King Jr.

Over the course of Trump’s first term and now a year into his second, the world has witnessed a consistent pattern of actions that challenge the basic long-standing norms of international cooperation, weaken multilateral institutions, and ignore the global norms and legal frameworks established by the UN Charter.

During these years, we have witnessed military operations in Iran, Syria and Ukraine without UN authorisation; the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani; repeated strikes across the Middle East; and the launch of tariff wars against allies and competitors alike. We have seen a renewed emphasis on nuclearism and zero interest in arms control and disarmament negotiations. Pentagon is now The Department of War.

We have seen travel bans targeting entire nationalities; visa denials for diplomats meant to attend UN meetings; and threats to withdraw from NATO while demanding that allies spend 5% of their GDP on the military without any shared threat analysis. We have also witnessed systematically confrontational policies and orchestrated and well-financed media campaigns directed against China and other actors.

U.S. policies have involved unwavering support for Israel’s devastating genocidal military campaign in Gaza; recognition of Juan Guaidó as “president” of Venezuela and the kidnapping of Nicolas Maduro with spouse as well as taking control over Venezuelan state assets; hard pressure on Ukraine to de facto let go of its natural resources; withdrawal from the JCPOA with Iran; and public statements about acquiring territories such as Canada, Mexico, Cuba, and Greenland — the latter being an integral part of Denmark, a loyal U.S. ally since 1948.

The rhetoric surrounding these actions has been confrontational, personalised as arrogant or vulgar, and consistently dismissive of international law. Domestically, Trump has dismissed officials, centralised executive power, and pursued a “law and order” agenda that cannot help but raise profound concerns about democratic norms within the United States. It is not only warfare on most of the world; it is also a domestic war.

The speed, surprise, and scale of these actions — combined with the near absence of meaningful international countermeasures — is likely to create the dangerous illusion within the Trump Regime circles: that such behaviour carries no cost, that it can continue indefinitely, and that the world will simply adjust to whatever it does next. Most likely, Trump thinks to himself – I can obviously get away with doing what I want – and I will.

Europe – fragmented, submissive, and visionless – has shown little willingness or ability to respond beyond words, and more words. Instead of developing a creative alternative West, European leaders travel physically or mentally to sit at the feet of the Emperor.

Military confrontation is neither realistic nor desirable, yet eminently productive tools such as diplomacy, conflict resolution, and concrete nonviolent measures have barely been considered. The result is paralysis — and paralysis invites escalation.

We believe this moment demands something different. Not passivity. Not fear. Not the old reflex of waiting for a “better” post-Trump America.

We demand – and propose – diplomatic and other nonviolent resistance — principled, lawful, creative, and global with the aim of stopping the Trump Regime from doing more harm to humanity.

What will follow this introduction, therefore, is four portfolios of immediate and long-term measures that governments, institutions, and citizens can take to signal boundaries, impose costs, and demonstrate that even the most militarily powerful state operates within limits.

None of these proposals is military, coercive, or vengeful. They are grounded in international law, civic mobilisation, economic sovereignty, and the collective strength of global civil society. But, yes, they require civil courage and a will to do some new thinking. The situation seems to make both imperative.

TFF’s four idea portfolios would imply the most far-reaching nonviolent resistance to U.S. policy since 1945.

It is necessary because the belief that the United States is inherently a force for good in our world — or that Trump is an aberration — has become a dangerous illusion. The elites inside the US Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex, MIMAC, feed him so that he can serve them.

Likewise, it is delusional to hope for the ‘good old America’ to return after Trump’s second (or third) term. His destruction of the US will be beyond repair. Furthermore, his personal style is indeed special, but he operates fully within the parameters of the US Empire and how an empire behaves when its decline and fall become more and more clear to itself and the rest of the world.

The world cannot rely on nostalgia or wishful thinking. One may paraphrase a thinker reflecting on the Second World War: those who sleep in times of peace and democracy may well wake up in a dictatorship at war.

TFF insists that better paths exist — grounded in creativity, nonviolence, and international law. We insist that there is a huge spectrum of possible actions between fighting the US militarily and doing nothing.

We therefore publish these Four Idea Portfolios of Resistance, followed by a vision for transforming the Arctic into a Zone of Cooperation that benefits local communities, the region, and the world.

Please look out for these five TFF documents in the near future.

If you find them useful and necessary, please share them widely so that we can build critical nonviolent mass for resistance and thereby promote a future with much more justice, peace and respect for global norms and laws.

The implementation of at least some of these ideas will also enable the world to again dialogue about solutions to humanity’s real and very urgent problems and reduce the attention to destructive Trumped-up militarism and imperial narratives.

The world must act now. The window of action may soon close.

Introduction: How Governments and Citizens Can Stop the Trump Regime’s World-Threatening Designs

Part 1 – Media, Culture and Information Sovereignty

Part 2 – Diplomacy, Law and Nonviolent Power

Part 3 – Economics, trade and financial sovereignty

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...