Mexico: 50 Peaceful Peace Policies

Toluca, Estado De México; Workshop on Drug Traffic and Violence

Background
300.000 kg of cocaine to USA via Mexico annually; 60% of marijuana producers had lived in misery, US$ 2/day; the drug traffic profit in Mexico was US$ 59 billion, 5% of GNP; 80% was spent on corruption; 125,000 were arrested since 2006; with an impunity of 98%.

Background
2,000 weapons from USA to Mexico daily; 5.5 million legal and 20 million illegal arms in Mexico; 100,000 have died in the “war on drugs” from 2006; 30,000 disappeared; 42+ journalists killed (more than in Afghanistan); 50,000 military troops involved by 2006, 130,000 by 2009, 50,000 in 2012, 32,000 in 2013; US$ 16.6 billion spent on insecurity and violence, 1.34% of GNP.

Conclusion
Due process of law and violence did not reduce drug traffic and violence; a drug-arms-violence-police-military complex had evolved. No general prevention, maybe not even individual prevention. A discourse-change took place: the perpetrators were seen less as evil and more as products of the domestic and regional contexts. The new approach was prevention by eliminating causes. The goal is reduction of drug traffic and of violence, and even if related they were seen as two different goals not necessarily served by the same means.

Question
Which are these means, causes to be handled?

* Policing borders? South: 956 kms, yes; North 3250 kms-not feasible.

* Eliminating arms inside? They can kill with knives, machetes.

* Economic growth? No, too much inequality and misery at the bottom.

* Economic distribution? Yes, if it lifts the bottom out of misery.

* More equality? Yes, if it makes dialogue and equal benefit easier.

* More conviviality? Yes, positive peace for security=negative peace.

* Identifying conflicts underlying violence: Yes, like fire to smoke.

* Learning how to solve conflict? Yes, at personal and social levels.

* Learning how to concile traumas? Yes, again at all levels.

Below are 50 ideas about how to do this, divided into 10 sectors with 5 proposals for each; some based on positive experiences abroad.

But take note of the discourse change. Talk violence, and you reap violence; talk causes, and you reap change. Violent and judicial approaches coming second to identify primary causes and do something has already had an impact. There is a modest optimism, well knowing it will take time. But these policies are also good in themselves, changing not only the atmosphere, but the reality of México.

Drug traffic has receded somewhat in the background, yielding to violence as the key problem. But, is it more drugs, or more traffic? Meaning, a long chain from production of cocaine in the white triangle in South America to consumption in the United States, with many links selling-and-buying with commissions charged? If so, could the chain–basic to an economic system with “middlemen”–be the problem? If not drugs, serving women traffic, children traffic, kidney traffic, treating human beings and lives as commodities to be traded? There is much money involved and much to be gained by killing the last seller.

To reduce the traffic the whole chain must be broken up, from beginning to end. And that brings us to the old problem: the countries offering supply, distribution, demand and consumption must all do their parts. Problem: we know nothing about what happens after the drugs pass into the USA, not how much is consumed and how much is buying-and-selling drugs going down the drain when the price has become too high. We do not even know who the dealers are except that many blacks fill US world record prisons accused of drug trade.

USA has to cooperate, making the US chain transparent, removing causes of consumption–comforting losers in a top competitive society? the lonely? filling a spiritual vacuum?–identify causes, do something. Does legalizing marijuana help? How about alcohol, tobacco? An annual report, please, like demanded of producer and distributor countries.

I. México federal level

1. COMNAPAZ, National Commission for Peace=Security + Conviviality

2. Organize bilateral dialogues, 32 entities, for mutual learning

3. Due process of law, publish names of murderers, outlaw arms

4. Dialogue with USA, CELAC, OAS; close borders to drugs and arms

5. Dialogue with China on Two Civilizations; U Yichang-U Querétaro

II. States + DF–32 entities–level

6. Organize dialogues among municipalities; for mutual learning

7. Lift up the poorest; credit to basic needs work by the most needy

8. Identify the most peaceful municipalities; prizes, investment

9. Establish zones of peace of neighboring peaceful municipalities

10. Establish an expanding archipelago of zones of peace in México

III. Municipalities–2,400+–level

11. Lift up the poorest families; subsidize basic needs, whole family

12. Have friend networks and social workers assist the most lonely

13. Have fiestas for conviviality; public transportation free

14. Have centers for trauma conciliation and conflict solution

15. Judicial mediation free for family-neighbor conflicts, etc.

IV. Peace Culture in general, against cultural violence

16. Dialogue, mediation, constructive-concrete-creative, 3C, search

17 Equity: cooperation for mutual and equal benefit

18. Empathy: understanding own and others’ world views and goals

19. Conciliation for Traumas, from past violence; 3 stages

20. Solution for Conflicts, Incompatible Goals; 2 goals->5 outcomes

V. Peace Structure in general, against structural violence

21. Reduce inequality lifting the bottom up to dignity and dialogue

22. Make negative relations neutral and neutral relations positive

23. Social growth: denser webs of positive relations at all levels

24. Link isolates to the rest and peripheries to each other

25. Peace Business attentive to side-effects for equitable relations

VI. Public space

26. Make it beautiful, accessible, affordable, safe

27. Make it multi-cultural in decoration and food served

28. Remove monuments celebrating belligerence

29. Introduce art celebrating love, care, solidarity

30. Un-uniformed karate+ guards for intervention when needed

VII. Media

31. Peace Journalism also focused on underlying conflicts

32. Focus on suffering and acceptable solutions to all sides

33. Serve a culture of solution- rather than victory-orientation

34. Peace Press-Radio-TV multi-angle, more positive news, solutions

35. Generous prizes annually for the best peace media, journalists

VIII. Schools

36. Peace Education covering all 50 points on this list and more

37. Involve students-teachers-parents-administrators; whole school

38. “Bully, what you did is unacceptable, but why did you do it?”

39. Two hours weekly for conflict work: goals, legitimate?, solution

40. At school problems may be structural, not in “difficult persons”

IX. Families

41. Prepare husbands for female emancipation as inevitable

42. Prepare both for parity mutual-equal-benefit in love, sex, work

43. Prepare parents for early children emancipation as inevitable

44. Promote internal family democracy for conflict work, solutions

45. Celebrate parity models for mutuality, emotional resonance, love

X. Work and daily life

46. At work problems may be structural, not in “difficult persons”

47. For peace at work, try more cooperative, less company, structure

48. Identify something good in all, relate to it; be friendly, smile

49. Compete with yourself rather than with others; self-improvement

50. Celebrate life as sacred, normalize peace, marginalize violence

First published at Transcend Media Service here.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...