Romanian and U.S. militarism increases insecurity in South Eastern Europa and the Black Sea Region

”Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”

President Dwight Eisenhower

The agreement recently signed between the government of Romania and the government of the United States represents one of the greatest political failures in Romania in recent decades. It is part of a continuing policy rooted in the absence of responsible politics and a reliance on increasing militarism and aggressive military engagement in a broader US dependent alliance.

Romania is the first post-Warsaw pact country to establish permanent US military bases in its territory, contributing to increased insecurity and militarization of the Black Sea region. This step is part of the policies of Romanian governments over the past 14 years – regardless of political party – which have led to the promotion of increased militarization, participation in three foreign wars and accompanying occupation, and misuse of national resources for excessive and unnecessary military expenditures.

US military deployment in Romania will include use of the Mihail Kogalniceanu airbase in southern Romania as the centre for its Eastern European Task Force (EATF). US forces will also use the Smardan training range, Babadag training area and Cincu training range. This is not the first time Romania has cooperated with the US military. In 2003 American soldiers used the Mihail Kogalniceanu air base to transfer US soldiers and military property into Iraq during the early stage of the Iraq war. Romania is also one of the few countries in the world which has increased its military presence in the occupation and war in Iraq, rather than calling for their withdrawal. Romania has 860 troops in the US occupation of Iraq, and additional troops in Afghanistan. Romania is also widely believed within Europe, internationally, and by Human Rights Watch, to be hosting a secret prison at the Mihail Kogalniceanu airbase as part of the United States global prison terror network, involving wide-spread illegal abduction and use of torture.

Given Romania’s own historical experiences of brutal and violent repression and use of torture against citizens by an authoritarian regime, Romania’s believed participation in this US run torture network, if true, is one of the greatest betrayals by the regime to the cause of human rights, democracy and freedom in Romania and internationally.

Active and engaged discussion of these issues, by all levels of Romanian society, media, academics and politicians is essential, whatever one’s position. Dialogue and investigation of alternatives and appropriate policies are vital. The participation of Romania as a host of foreign military bases and participant in wars which escalate and increase violence and threat of terrorism world-wide represents an extreme negative choice in the range of options facing the country. The measly economic benefit which will be brought in by US bases – a core focus of nearly all media reporting on the issue – will not equal the economic loss to Romania through misappropriation of revenue for increased military expenditures and the Bechtel highway in the country, nor the damage done by Romania for prospects for greater democratization and economic, social and political cooperation in Europe, South Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region. Romania today is becoming a country rapidly losing the respect of its own citizens and the world for the foreign policy roles it is playing.

In 1968 when the Soviet military illegally invaded Czechoslovakia, Romania had the courage and integrity to refuse to take part, and provided a refuge and asylum to Czechoslovak dissidents. This represented a high-point in Romania’s refusal to be involved in illegal acts of aggression and war, even when under significant pressure, building upon its past positive experience in the inter-war period in promoting disarmament and non-aggression. In 2002 Romania was one of the first countries to ask to be allowed to participate in the illegal war and occupation in Iraq which has so far contributed to the deaths of more than 100,000 Iraqi citizens, and continued instability and violence in the country, including wide-spread use of torture and human rights violations by the occupying countries.

In 1958 Soviet military forces and bases were withdrawn from Romania representing a step, if only a small one, to increased independence and sovereignty for the country. In 2005, Romania has invited another foreign power to establish military bases on Romanian soil, contributing to the expansion of military bases world-wide and a failure to develop responsible, effective and practical policies to deal with the challenges and issues facing Romania and the world today. Experience from the United States global network of bases has also shown a long track record of increases in prostitution, sexual violence, and rape, bringing negative social consequences, environmental pollution and human rights violations.

Concrete Proposals and Therapy

These policies and their importance to the country mean that they belong in the democratic space of decision making where all citizens have a right and responsibility to take part. Media, academics, NGOs, writers, politicians and all citizens in the country have a vital role to play in engendering a vibrant, constructive discussion of the challenges and issues facing Romania, domestically and internationally, and developing effective policies and responses which address the needs of Romania and its citizens and contribute to the promotion of democracy, human rights, and the effective and peaceful transformation of conflicts in the region and internationally.

The following are a number of proposals which represent a practical and principled alternative for Romanian foreign policy:

• Non-stationing of foreign military bases in Romania: a policy which would prevent any country from maintaining foreign military bases in Romania, including withdrawal from all treaties which allow for the positioning of foreign military bases and the use of Romanian territory and airspace for military action against other countries

• Non-participation in illegal wars and acts of aggression against foreign countries: including respect for international law and the UN charter and withdrawal of all Romanian military units and personnel participating in the US wars of occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan

• Active participation in international fora, the UN and European Union to develop effective responses and practical solutions to the challenges of war and terrorism in the world today: Romania has so far played a minimal if not totally absent role in meaningful efforts by countries internationally to develop effective responses to addressing the root causes of terrorism (state and non-state), and developing effective mechanisms and tools for the resolution of domestic and international conflicts and prevention of war. This should change, with Romania, building upon its own historical experience, playing an active role in building international cooperation and alliances (with governments and citizens) to promote dialogue, respect for human rights, and regional and international efforts to transform conflicts constructively and effectively through peaceful means.

• Promotion of a ‘Demilitarized Zone/Peace Zone’ in the Black Sea Region: As an example of this, Romania could pioneer a policy of constructive engagement with all countries in the Black Sea Region for the total demilitarization of this international space and the promotion of greater regional social, political and economic development and integration and creation of a Zone of Peace in the Black Sea Region.

Would you be reading this now,
if it wasn’t useful to you?
Get more quality articles in the future

• Support for the creation of a UN Commission on Peacebuilding and EU Peace Commissioner and Peacebuilding Office: Going a step further, Romania could play an active role in supporting the development of effective infrastructure and mechanisms for the peaceful resolution and transformation of conflicts within Europe and internationally

• Establish a Romanian Ministry for Peace, Civil Peace Service and national peacebuilding infrastructure: Addressing this on a domestic level and following the model now being developed throughout Europe and internationally to professionally train foreign service and civil personnel for crisis response and prevention, conflict transformation, emergency relief and humanitarian aid, and post-war and post-violence recovery and reconstruction

• Support democratization, human rights mobilization and peace work in Iraq, Afghanistan, the United States and Britain: Providing direct government-to-government, citizen-to-citizen, civil society and sectoral cooperation – including teachers, engineers, and human rights workers – to organisations, communities and citizens in these countries working to promote democratization, respect for human rights, and the transformation of conflicts within their countries and in their countries’ engagement internationally.

• Support and encourage responsible media reporting: The media has a vital role to play in ensuring that citizens have access to correct and diverse information. Citizens, academics, politicians, and NGOs should support and encourage media and journalists in Romania to critically question and investigate and provide professional and responsible reporting and coverage of diverse opinions on such important issues.

• Promote democratic discussion and involvement on these issues in Romania: Including creating citizens fora and spaces for discussing these issues, public meetings, and vibrant dialogue and sharing of opinions and perspectives, as well as direct action to promote awareness and understanding of the issues facing the country and responsible policy options and alternatives.

These are policies which, if properly discussed and brought forward, could be supported by the overwhelming majority of citizens in Romania, and earn Romania the respect of the international community.

Continuing on Romania’s current path can only lead to increased disillusionment and loss of respect for Romania as a member of the community of nations, and Romania’s continuing contribution to war crimes and crimes against humanity through participation in wars and (possible) torture networks.

Alternatives are possible. It is up to citizens, media, academics, writers, politicians and all sectors of society in Romania to discuss these issues, to explore the impacts and effects of different policies and actions, and to choose through democratic processes the policies which meet the needs of the country, and contribute to the promotion of peace, human rights, and the abolition of war and terrorism world-wide.

The challenge is there! May we have the courage to take it up.

Links and Resources

Peace Action, Training and Research Institute of Romania (PATRIR)

Foreign Policy in Focus

TRANSCEND

US Department of Peace

Ministry for peace UK

Department of Peace Canada

TFF – Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research

Conflict Prevention Partnership

Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict (GPPAC)

Z Magazine

European Peacebuilding Liaison Office

Nonviolent Peaceforce

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...