Peace Candidate for President of Iceland

The vast majority of people around the world are much better off in peacetime than in war.  Only a few arms merchants and power-hungry politicians benefit from war, at the expense of soldiers who are sent into battle, and the ever growing number of civilian victims of war.

Iceland is in a unique position to promote a new agenda for world peace, based on its history of the Althing, the world’s oldest democratic legislative assembly, established in 930.  It is a forum where differences can be aired and mutually acceptable solutions explored.  In the year 1000, Norwegian missionaries wanted to impose Christianity in Iceland.  A religious war threatened.  But at the Althing, it was decided to adopt Christianity, without outlawing traditional rituals if done in private, and this helped avoid a war.  While people talk, they don’t shoot.

In addition, Icelanders have never served in military forces. This may well be a key reason why Iceland has enjoyed centuries of peace.  Similarly, Costa Rica has enjoyed peace since it abolished its army after a brief civil war in 1948, while its Central American neighbors suffered from war, and Costa Rica’s per capita income is twice that of its neighbors, because it invested in its civilian economy what its neighbors spent for their military.

In November 2002, the current government of Iceland proposed to use Icelandic passenger aircraft to carry U.S. weapons and troops to the Gulf.  Thor Magnusson, founder of Peace 2000 (www.peace2000.org, www.althing.us), was arrested and imprisoned after sending an email to the police, aviation authorities, airlines and government officials warning that if Icelandic aircraft would carry weapons and troops to support an illegal war against Iraq, the airlines would become legitimate war targets and could be attacked by terrorist organizations.  The Icelandic government tried to get Thor sentenced for up to 16 years in prison based on new terrorist laws.  In February 2004, Thor won the case both in Reykjavik District Court and the Icelandic High Court.  “Our victory is not winning the case in court, it is that we stopped this crazy plan of using passenger aircraft of Icelandair to carry weapons and troops to the Gulf” said Thor.

If Iceland elects Thor Magnusson as President, he will give voice to the vast majority of people around the world who want peace, but are seldom heard.  His platform includes three key points: (1) setting up an institute for democratic studies that will help develop true democracy, as a model for the entire world; (2) converting the US military base in Iceland into the headquarters of a United Nations peacekeeping force; (3) creating an institute for conflict resolution where conflict parties from around the world can meet with experienced mediators.

The history of Iceland can serve as a blueprint for a peaceful world and the transition of nations from national military forces to common security.  Negotiating a peaceful agreement before violence breaks out is not only much less costly, but can save many lives.

Dialogue forums, modelled after the Icelandic Althing, can be formed in conflict regions around the world, including such places as the Middle East, where citizens with different positions and viewpoints can assemble and explore peaceful solutions to the conflict.

The current justice minister wants to introduce an Icelandic army.  Thor has a much better plan.  As the American troops are now scheduled to leave their military base in Iceland, he proposes to use it as headquarters of an international peace-keeping force.  Nations that want to abolish their national military can sign a contract to be protected by that force, for a relatively small annual fee, as Alan F. Kay and Hazel Henderson (www.alanfkay.com) have long advocated.  For each country to maintain its own military forces is as wasteful as if each building in a town had its own fire brigade, instead of the house owners pooling their resources for one fire brigade that can be deployed wherever and whenever needed.  Countries that take steps to avoid war, such as accepting binding arbitration in international disputes, can get reduced rates, in the same way as households that keep a fire-extinguisher can get reduced fire insurance rates.

Thor also plans to establish an International Conflict Resolution Center, where parties to conflicts from around the world can be invited for talks, assisted by experienced, creative mediators, who can help the parties find solutions that meet everyone’s essential needs.

There are many examples from history where individuals were able to avert bloodshed through original proposals that were acceptable to all sides.  For example, a civil war in Romania between the ethnic Rumanian majority and the country’s ethnic Hungarian minority was averted through mediation that produced a solution that allows the Hungarians to use their own language in schools and local newspapers, in return for a promise not to seek secession.  This involved only a few people, for a relatively short time, whereas sending a peacekeeping force to quell fighting after violence has erupted takes tens of thousands of troops, for years,  and costs many lives.

The series of wars between Ecuador an Peru over an uninhabited small border territory ended when the Norwegian peace researcher Johan Galtung proposed to make the disputed territory a “bi-national zone”, jointly administered by both governments, with a natural park to attract tourists and bring more income to both countries.  He pointed out that this cost only $250 for a meal with the incoming president and a night in a hotel, whereas the first Gulf war cost $100 billion, not counting the destruction it caused, and the lives lost.

What the world needs is an active peace policy that anticipates dangers and avoids them before they are upon us, instead of reacting afterwards, as is usually the case.  Better a fence at the top of a cliff than an ambulance waiting at the bottom.

The new threat of international terrorism cannot be conquered with force alone.  Killing terrorists turns them into martyrs, which attract more followers.  Terrorism resembles the ancient dragon, the “hydra,” with multiple heads, and each time a head is cut off, ten new ones grow.  It is necessary to find the root causes, what motivates men and women to commit suicide for a cause they believe in.  Only if we address the roots, can we hope to eliminate terrorism.

The policy of nuclear deterrence pursued by the great powers is absurd.  It is a mutual suicide pact.  It is as if we packed our car full of dynamite, to explode on impact, in order to deter others from hitting our car.  But accidents do happen.  We better establish traffic rules for international relations to prevent deadly clashes.

Is a peace policy utopian?  On the contrary, it is the only realistic approach that can save us.  The greatest utopians are those who call themselves “realists”, because they believe we can survive the nuclear age with power politics of the past.

The world needs a peace president who can help lift the veil from our eyes that has blinded us for too long, and help us initiate the institutions and policies that can help restore peace in the world.  Thor Magnusson can and will do that.  Iceland has a great opportunity to lead the world to peace.  I hope Iceland’s voters will seize that opportunity.

A smaller country like Iceland is in a much better position to undertake peace initiatives than one of the big powers, like the United States or Russia, or the former colonial powers UK, France, Germany and Italy, because they would be suspected of pursuing their own interests.  Iceland, without a history of colonization, is above that suspicion.

There are precedents.  In 1973, Finnish President Urho Kekkonen invited all European countries to send delegations to the Helsinki Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, which lasted until 1975, and prepared the way for the end of the Cold War.  All European countries except Albania came.  As President, Kekkonen had the status to convene such a meeting.

A second example is Costa Rican President Oscar Arias Sanchez.  After he was elected in 1986, he consulted with all the other Central American Presidents about the unsuccessful draft agreements produced during the Contadora process.  He rewrote them based on his consultations, and in a meeting in Guatemala City on August 7, 1987, he got the Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador and Nicaragua to sign with him an agreement that provided for dialogue between governments and opposition groups, ending the shipment of arms to insurgents, amnesty for insurgents if they lay down their arms, democracy, and free elections.  The agreement, Esquipulas II, named after the location of the initial meeting in Guatemala, became the basis for peace agreements not only for the Contra war in Nicaragua, but also for later peace agreements in El Salvador and Guatemala.  Oscar Arias won the 1987 Nobel Peace Prize.

Thor Magnusson, as President of Iceland, will make use of the opportunities offered by this position to put Iceland on the map as a source of peace in the world.  It has already happened elsewhere, which proves that it is possible.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...