Is Civilization a Good Idea?

By Majid Tehranian
Professor, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Director, Toda Institute for Global Peace and Policy Research, Tokyo and Honolulu
 

July 26, 2002

When someone asked Mahatma Gandhi what do you think of Western Civilization, he promptly replied, “It is a good idea!”  

Having traveled on the ancient Silk and Spice Roads and beyond, I am dubious of distinctions between Eastern and Western Civilizations.  It is much more realistic to think of civilization in the singular rather than plural.  There are many cultures but only one global civilization. 

Globalization is not a new phenomenon.  Cultural exchange has been going on for centuries. We can find few cultures in the world that have not borrowed from others.  The first globalization took place along the ancient Spice and Silk Roads.  The second globalization occurred when Columbus “discovered” the New World.  The European colonization of Africa, Asia, and Americas forcibly brought East and West into intimate contact.  The third globalization is now in progress through global communication and markets.

Discerning students of history cannot fail but to note an overwhelming fact.  We may loosely speak of Western, Chinese, or Islamic civilizations, but in reality there is only one civilization to which we all belong.   In every major city, we can now witness its mixed blessings, including Coca Cola, Pizza parlors, Sushi bars, Sony, IBM, CNN, and BBC.  All these products are clearly gifts of the industrial world to the rest.   But who invented fire?  Probably the Africans.  The wheel?  Probably the Central Asian nomads. Decimal numbers?  The Indians and Arabs.  Writing? The Egyptians, Sumerians, and Greeks.  Postal system?  The Persians.  Gunpowder, paper money, silk, and compass?   The Chinese.  Printing?  The Chinese, Koreans, and Germans.  I can go on and on.

Like a torch in a relay marathon, civilization has been passed on from hand to hand.  Paleontologists tell us that the African nomads led the way.  The latest ancestor of homo sapiens has been found in Chad in a skeleton dating back 7 million years ago. The agriculturalists of major river basins then followed.  The traders of the Silk and Spice Roads then accumulated huge fortunes in such commercial cities as Xian, Samarkand, Bokhara, Isfahan, Baghdad, Aleppo, Athens, Venice, and Rome.  With the introduction of manufacturing and rise of industrial societies, it was then the turn of Western Europe.   The industrial civilization was subsequently exported to the New World.   Ever since the rise of informatics, the United States has been on the forefront.

Human civilization has thus developed from its nomadic phase (99% of human history) to the agrarian, commercial, industrial, and informatic stages.  Two facts of history stand out in this process: Domination and Resistance.  Those peoples who have technologically and economically led the way have also militarily dominated the rest of the world.  In empire after empire, those who have fallen behind have resisted the dominant.  It is foolishly human for those who are temporarily ahead to claim some kind of moral superiority.   But technological, economic, and military advance do not automatically confer moral superiority.

The litmus test in moral achievement is to reach the golden rule: “In everything, do to others what you would have them do to you.”  This is a paramount Christian ethical imperative that has perennially resonated in the Judaic, Greek, Confucian, Buddhist, and Islamic philosophies. On that test, most of our civilization is failing today.   

Civilization is a journey, not a destination. Like democracy, it is an unfinished project.  We are deluding ourselves if we claim to have arrived at a civilized or democratic state.  Civilization and democracy are ideals worth striving for.   A democratic government of the people, by the people, and for the people has not yet been achieved anywhere in the world. As the current global terrorism and counter-terrorism demonstrate, a civilized society is devoutly to be wished.  The price of a democratic civilization is eternal vigilance. 

In his 2002 peace proposals, Buddhist leader Daisaku Ikeda has focused on the dawn of a global civilization.  He has called for the Buddhist middle way to resolve the world’s most enduring problems, including poverty, nuclear disarmament, sustainable development, and terrorism.  Ikeda confirms the findings and recommendations of the Earth Charter (see www.earthchater.org), a people’s document echoing the golden rule and middle way.  We will perish in nuclear holocaust or ecological disaster if we fail to build a truly global civilization based on those core values. 

=============================================================
Majid Tehranian, Professor

School of Communications, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Tel.: 808-956-3353; Fax: 808-956-5591; Email: majid@hawaii.edu

=============================================================
Director, Toda Institute for Global Peace and Policy Research

1600 Kapiolani Blvd., Suite 1111, Honolulu, HI 96812, USA

Tel.: 808-955-8231; Fax: 808-955-6476

Email: majid@toda.org; Website: www.toda.org

=============================================================

Home: 2627 Manoa Rd., Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Tel.: 808-988-9563; Fax: 808-988-4483

Personal website: www2.hawaii.edu/~majid

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...