China’s comparative advantage in knowledge about the West

When travelling around China, one of many things to note is that the Chinese are very positive toward the West, make use of Western inspirations, and know much more about the West than Westerners know about China.
This is quite remarkable because, historically, China has been the object of ruthless Western colonialism and warfare as well as racism—e.g. the ”yellow fewer/danger” syndrome—while China has done nothing similar to the West.

Here are some examples, big and small, of the mentioned knowledge and fascination of the West:

• Many young Chinese have chosen to have a Western name, like, say, Alison or Kevin. They say it is difficult for us in the West to remember and pronounce Chinese names.

• The Chinese know all the Western brands and gladly call their products something related to the West. They love to play with English when giving their company or shop a name like. One of the popular cars is BYD: Build Your Dreams, which is written in capital letters across the car’s luggage compartment.

• Wealthy people find it essential to drive Western luxury cars – BMW, Porsche, or even a Rolls Royce.

• Contrary to just 40 years ago, the Chinese dress like us, and most T-shirts reference London or New York or an English slogan across the chest. You can buy clothes, shoes, perfumes, etc. from every Western brand here.

• Chinese advertising is full of female and male faces that look more Western than Chinese. – like “buy our product and you’ll look more Western.”

• There is lots of Western music here in China – walk into any bar, and you’ll hear mellow jazz and a lot of Chinese pop is inspired by the West. The Chinese love Western classical music, don’t be surprised to hear Beethoven being played in the background of a department store. Or think of Lang Lang.

• There will invariably be a series of Hollywood films and blockbusters on Chinese flight entertainment programs.

• The larger museums contain Chinese art or historical relics, but there is a consistent policy of also giving the Chinese an opportunity to acquaint themselves with Western art, not least European artists.

• Just a few decades ago, the Chinese would drink tea only, but now it is fine to drink coffee and enjoy a cake with it. Any hotel breakfast will serve bacon, eggs, and other continental breakfast items. (Although you will still hardly ever see cheese.)

• Many more Chinese speak English, at least some English, than Westerners speak Chinese.

All the Western brands are here…

• All road signs and place names in the street and metros will also be written in English – you’ll never find yourself lost because you do not read the Chinese signs.

• The Chinese do not seek conflict. If you visit a company which is an object of Western economic sanctions and has paid a price for them, it seems impossible to make the leaders of it express any negative attitude. They will avoid the question or perhaps give you a quote from President Xi Jinping about harmony and hard work to achieve better results from one year to the next. An imam I conversed with in Xinjiang answered by stating that there would, over time, develop a better mutual understanding – seemingly unable to see the US accusation about genocide as anything but a sign of lack of knowledge, not as an accusation. Trying to achieve some kind of harmony and balance is essential for the Chinese way of thinking.

• Wherever you go in China, there is a positive attitude to you as a visitor. You are not being associated with the hostile West; you are seen and treated as a friend. They distinguish between the Western citizen and the Western governments, and you never feel guilty by association – in contrast to what many Chinese often feel in the West. And, by the way, you feel and are safe everywhere, night and day.

• Believe it or not, Ren Zhengfei, the founder of the Shenzhen-based Huawei company – one of the world’s most successful – has built a large French-German-style village as a campus inside which the researchers work. He has also built a classic-style library with a cupola that contains no less than 70,000 books – many of which are art, philosophy, science, etc, books from the West – for instance, David Hockney’s macro volumes on art. He is simply fascinated by what he has seen in Europe. At Fudan University in the outskirts of Shanghai, I met a scholar who was a specialist on Marxism whose entire office and seminar room was devoted to Western philosophy. And somewhere, a bookstore calls itself the Goethe Bookstore.

A section of one of Huawei’s research campuses in Shenzhen, China. It also runs a hotel with 3000 beds for visitors, part-time scholars and others the company interacts with.

• Thousands upon thousands of young Chinese have studied or are studying in the West. But how many Western students have gone to China? The majority of media people I have met here have, at some point, been studying in the US or England. They can compare Western and Eastern ways of thinking – and censorship. The same goes for many Chinese scholars, academics and artists: they have acquainted themselves with the West and been inspired by it – admire it. They know the West in ways few Westerners know China.

• China has imported so much from the West – including Marxism, capitalism, consumerism, Western culture, lifestyle and ways of doing things. It’s been consistently curious about the West and eclectically combined elements of socio-economic development into a synergetic whole. It has assimilated, emulated and adapted with curiosity. Forty years ago, its streets were filled with bicycles, today’s Beijing has 6 million cars, many more innovative than those produced by the West.

• When you read Chinese media, you’ll find much more news, features and videos about what happens in the West than you’ll find news about China – and other non-Western countries – in Western mainstream media. Lots of the best Chinese media have employed Westerners as anchors, columnists and documentarists.

What I am getting at here is that the West has a lot of homework to do regarding China. The generally negative attitude toward China in our media, research, and politics does not stem from China but from the West itself.

The negativity is proportionate to the ignorance: Grosso modo, Westerners are woefully ignorant about China and have always been. It seems OK to see China as a threat, a dictatorship, as authoritarian, as human rights violating, etc., without knowing a thing about China or the Chinese people’s ways of thinking – or without ever having visited it.

Furthermore, China is judged on Western criteria, not its own criteria and achievements. Western mainstream media predominantly do a disservice to the public, and most recently, the US passed a law that sets off US$ 1600 million over five years to ensure that there are only China-negative stories in our media. How weak the West has become – and how sad for someone who used to champion free media and free opinion-formation. For more, please consult TFF’s comprehensive analyses in the “Smokescreen Report” and follow our new anthology in the making “If You Want To Understand China”.

Interestingly, Westerners who have visited China as tourists or have worked in and with China as business people, scholars, etc., generally have a much more balanced view of China and the Chinese people.

Regrettably, it is much easier to project a generally negative image of China and its people when Westerners know little or nothing about them. Should the Chinese leadership wish to create a similarly negative image of the West in the Chinese mind, it would have to work hard—if at all possible.

Fortunately, there is no sign that they aim to do that. Every speech by China’s leaders emphasises the benefits of cooperation with the West while also stressing that China has a right to develop its own society and future the way it sees fit. It is not going to become anything like the West – and that is good for diversity and global creativity.

The world is not getting richer from one system, no matter which, trying to dominate all others. It will be richer by many different actors working together in multiple ways and inspiring each other – achieving synergy and change. Unity in diversity, not in uniformity.

The West’s problem is that, for centuries, it has seen itself as the leader, as # 1. Those who do that in any system tend to see themselves as teachers, not as learners because they believe they are operating on a higher civilisational level and/or have ”better” values that deserve to be universalised.

In summary, it is high time that the West recognises that it has homework to do – and begins to do it today rather than tomorrow.

China’s development since opening up to the world in 1978—its betterment of people’s living conditions—is unique in human history. It has not only made China a much better place but it has also made a great contribution to humanity’s development and welfare and continues to do so with visionary projects such as the Belt and Road Initiative, BRI.

The Chinese would be the last to tell you that everything is perfect in China. However, their only constants are change and striving to do things better today than yesterday. China deserves a decent, fair analysis based on knowledge and respect for its culture and civilisation instead of government-manufactured negative narratives rooted in deep ignorance.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...

Recent Articles

Jan ObergTFF director ☮️ When this morning – August 19, 2026 – I saw the above new US Trump map, I came to think of Frank Zappa, The Mothers of Invention, who said that politics is the entertainment division of the Military-Industrial Complex. That formulation beats many academic analyses – as you will have understood […]
A Civilizational Interpretation of the West’s Body Politic Pascal Lottaz Associate professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto and TFF Board member August 25, 2026 “How do we explain the self-defeating and self-harming policies of Western states? Europe seems to be happily deindustrializing, the US proxy war in Ukraine is killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) […]
LONDON – Many of the great and the good have dismissed the utility of nuclear weapons as well as finding the idea of their use morally indefensible but still they exist in enormous numbers in the arsenals of the great powers. Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara and Secretary of State Dean Rusk both came to be convinced during their tenure in the Kennedy administration that their use was “unthinkable”. President George H.W. Bush has written that in private he ruled out a nuclear response during the 1991 Gulf War although in public his Administration did not. General Colin Powell, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his autobiography recalls chiding his boss, Dick Cheney, for even considering it. Paul Nitze, one of the principal architects of containing the Soviet Union by nuclear deterrence, went even further. He argued in a Washington Post article in 1994 that it...

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan ObergTFF director ☮️ When this morning – August 19, 2026 – I saw the above new US Trump map, I came to think of Frank Zappa, The Mothers of Invention, who said that politics is the entertainment division of the Military-Industrial Complex. That formulation beats many academic analyses – as you will have understood […]
A Civilizational Interpretation of the West’s Body Politic Pascal Lottaz Associate professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto and TFF Board member August 25, 2026 “How do we explain the self-defeating and self-harming policies of Western states? Europe seems to be happily deindustrializing, the US proxy war in Ukraine is killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) […]
LONDON – Many of the great and the good have dismissed the utility of nuclear weapons as well as finding the idea of their use morally indefensible but still they exist in enormous numbers in the arsenals of the great powers. Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara and Secretary of State Dean Rusk both came to be convinced during their tenure in the Kennedy administration that their use was “unthinkable”. President George H.W. Bush has written that in private he ruled out a nuclear response during the 1991 Gulf War although in public his Administration did not. General Colin Powell, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his autobiography recalls chiding his boss, Dick Cheney, for even considering it. Paul Nitze, one of the principal architects of containing the Soviet Union by nuclear deterrence, went even further. He argued in a Washington Post article in 1994 that it...
Read More
HQAB7NMWUAA1gSk
Jan ObergTFF director ☮️ When this morning – August 19, 2026 – I saw the above new US Trump map, I came to think of Frank Zappa, The Mothers of Invention, who said that politics is the entertainment division of the Military-Industrial Complex. That formulation beats many academic analyses – as you will have understood […]
21b7244b-c83e-46c1-ba23-556b21b9a0a8_1536x1024
A Civilizational Interpretation of the West’s Body Politic Pascal Lottaz Associate professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto and TFF Board member August 25, 2026 “How do we explain the self-defeating and self-harming policies of Western states? Europe seems to be happily deindustrializing, the US proxy war in Ukraine is killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) […]
Imagen-thumbnail-The-Transnational-1
LONDON – Many of the great and the good have dismissed the utility of nuclear weapons as well as finding the idea of their use morally indefensible but still they exist in enormous numbers in the arsenals of the great powers. Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara and Secretary of State Dean Rusk both came to be convinced during their tenure in the Kennedy administration that their use was “unthinkable”. President George H.W. Bush has written that in private he ruled out a nuclear response during the 1991 Gulf War although in public his Administration did not. General Colin Powell, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his autobiography recalls chiding his boss, Dick Cheney, for even considering it. Paul Nitze, one of the principal architects of containing the Soviet Union by nuclear deterrence, went even further. He argued in a Washington Post article in 1994 that it...
Screenshot-2026-08-22-011310
August 24, 2026 Lena Petrova & Jan Oberg I am truly happy and honoured to have been invited by Lena to her unique channel, World Affairs In Context where she has over 600,000 subscribers. She covers a very wide range of global themes, based not least on her own deep and broad knowledge of economics. I want […]
Logo-Transnational
Greenland – the world’s largest island, a continent of its own with only 57.000 inhabitants. I visited it for the first time in May 2005. I flew across the inland ice to Nuuk, the tiny capital with some 14.000 inhabitants. I was overwhelmed by the pride and kindness of everyone I met as well as by the unique natural beauty. Unfortunately, due to weather conditions during my ten-day stay I could get nowhere else but Nuuk. Fortunately, however, among those I met was Gitte Arvegaard, a Danish lawyer and negotiator employed by the local government, Greenland Home Rule. She turned out to be an enthusiastic photographer with a lot of pictures taken during various trips around Greenland. So this Greeland series is the result of our cooperative effort. We both hope you enjoy it and are stimulated to visit Greenland – about which you may read more here. Finally, if you want to...
p_mccartney_poem
 Jan Oberg’s storyof how he met Sir Paul Liverpool – where else to meet Paul McCartney? Paul’s old class mate and TFF Associate, Jonathan Power introduced me to Paul McCartney in Liverpool at an informal reception. It was held at what used to be their school, now the Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts and we were there to celebrate that Jonathan had written Amnesty International’s 40th Anniversary book. This happy event for “righting wrongs and writing songs” gave me an opportunity to meet Paul and tell him about TFF and get straight to the matter: would he consider making a donation in support of our work for peace? While I was probably the only one with such a wish that day, I was certainly not the only one who wanted to shake hands and talk with him. In the last minutes before Paul was to leave, Jonathan brought us together and we got about three...