These Targetted Attacks – Minab among them

Iranians enjoying life 2016 © Jan Oberg

Elaheh Pooyandeh, TFF Associate

Written on February 28, 2026, and published on March 9, 2026.

I’m a night owl. I usually get to work around 10 a.m. This morning, I’m on the subway, just two stations away from the office, when my phone rings. It’s my young colleague. For weeks, he has been obsessively following the news of a possible war, refreshing pages, scanning channels, bracing himself.

“Hi Elaheh,” he says. “Israel has attacked again.”

By the time I reach the office, some colleagues are already leaving to pick up their children. Others stand, frozen, trying to decide what to do or waiting for someone to come for them. A few minutes later, the evacuation notice arrives. Our office is in the center of Tehran, in an all-glass building. Staying is not an option. Glass does not negotiate with missiles.

I leave and go back to the subway. The station is overflowing with people—anxious, restless—trying to get somewhere, as quickly as possible, as if speed itself could offer protection. It’s so crowded that I have to wait for several trains before I can squeeze in. Inside the carriage, people are talking about the attack. And then someone says, almost casually:

“Ah, it’s targeted attacks.”

“Oh really?” I say. “Then, for example, the attack on Evin Prison last time was targeted too?”

“You don’t know,” they reply, with a smirk. “It was the judiciary’s medical clinic.”

As if that distinction matters.

As if precision cleanses violence.

As if renaming a target resurrects the dead.

I get home. There is no internet, only intranet. By now, this is routine. Any crisis, any tension, even the smallest sign of instability, and access is cut. The Internet here is no longer part of life; it is a privilege that can be revoked at will. What remains are state television and a handful of Iranian news outlets, most of them echoing official narratives. I avoid those as much as I can. I refuse to donate my attention to propaganda.

I tell myself I won’t obsess. I refresh the page once an hour.

That’s when I read about the attack on Minab Girls’ Elementary School. At least a dozen children are dead. My stomach drops. An hour later, the number is twenty. I check again. And again. A few hours pass, and the number is fifty-seven. I burst into tears.

Fifty-seven children.

Killed in minutes.

Now I’m afraid to check the news – but I can’t stop. The number keeps rising. Eighty. More. And one phrase keeps circling in my head, like an insult disguised as analysis:

“Targeted attacks.”

One hundred and eight targeted attacks (1).

Targeted attacks that kill children in minutes.

Targeted attacks that are supposed to bring peace, freedom, and democracy.

Targeted attacks that will “relieve us” from the suffering of an authoritarian regime.

Targeted attacks that cancel our projects, suspend our lives, and leave us jobless overnight.

Targeted attacks that tear apart homes.

Targeted attacks that target life itself.

Targeted attacks that are normalised – expected – when they happen to people in this geography.

Targeted attacks that are called “pre-emptive strikes” when carried out by Israel or the United States, but evidence of barbarism when attributed to Iranians.

Targeted attacks that Western media frame as efforts to “stop Iran’s nuclear program” or deliver a “regime change” that Iranians are supposedly begging for.

And then I remember something else.

As I leave the subway station that day, I hear a young person say out loud, while walking, with a flatness that frightens me more than anger ever could:

“Let them attack and kill us all. It’ll be a relief.”

Words that come from exhaustion.

So yes – no matter how bitter these words sound, they reflect a brutal truth.

We are not citizens in this story.

We are not even collateral damage.

We are the targets.

Footnote

(1) The final count of schoolchildren killed in this attack reaches 165.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Jan ObergTFF director ☮️ When this morning – August 19, 2026 – I saw the above new US Trump map, I came to think of Frank Zappa, The Mothers of Invention, who said that politics is the entertainment division of the Military-Industrial Complex. That formulation beats many academic analyses – as you will have understood […]
A Civilizational Interpretation of the West’s Body Politic Pascal Lottaz Associate professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto and TFF Board member August 25, 2026 “How do we explain the self-defeating and self-harming policies of Western states? Europe seems to be happily deindustrializing, the US proxy war in Ukraine is killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) […]
August 24, 2026 Lena Petrova & Jan Oberg I am truly happy and honoured to have been invited by Lena to her unique channel, World Affairs In Context where she has over 600,000 subscribers. She covers a very wide range of global themes, based not least on her own deep and broad knowledge of economics. I want […]

Recent Articles

Jan ObergTFF director ☮️ When this morning – August 19, 2026 – I saw the above new US Trump map, I came to think of Frank Zappa, The Mothers of Invention, who said that politics is the entertainment division of the Military-Industrial Complex. That formulation beats many academic analyses – as you will have understood […]
A Civilizational Interpretation of the West’s Body Politic Pascal Lottaz Associate professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto and TFF Board member August 25, 2026 “How do we explain the self-defeating and self-harming policies of Western states? Europe seems to be happily deindustrializing, the US proxy war in Ukraine is killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) […]
LONDON – Many of the great and the good have dismissed the utility of nuclear weapons as well as finding the idea of their use morally indefensible but still they exist in enormous numbers in the arsenals of the great powers. Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara and Secretary of State Dean Rusk both came to be convinced during their tenure in the Kennedy administration that their use was “unthinkable”. President George H.W. Bush has written that in private he ruled out a nuclear response during the 1991 Gulf War although in public his Administration did not. General Colin Powell, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his autobiography recalls chiding his boss, Dick Cheney, for even considering it. Paul Nitze, one of the principal architects of containing the Soviet Union by nuclear deterrence, went even further. He argued in a Washington Post article in 1994 that it...

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan ObergTFF director ☮️ When this morning – August 19, 2026 – I saw the above new US Trump map, I came to think of Frank Zappa, The Mothers of Invention, who said that politics is the entertainment division of the Military-Industrial Complex. That formulation beats many academic analyses – as you will have understood […]
A Civilizational Interpretation of the West’s Body Politic Pascal Lottaz Associate professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto and TFF Board member August 25, 2026 “How do we explain the self-defeating and self-harming policies of Western states? Europe seems to be happily deindustrializing, the US proxy war in Ukraine is killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) […]
LONDON – Many of the great and the good have dismissed the utility of nuclear weapons as well as finding the idea of their use morally indefensible but still they exist in enormous numbers in the arsenals of the great powers. Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara and Secretary of State Dean Rusk both came to be convinced during their tenure in the Kennedy administration that their use was “unthinkable”. President George H.W. Bush has written that in private he ruled out a nuclear response during the 1991 Gulf War although in public his Administration did not. General Colin Powell, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his autobiography recalls chiding his boss, Dick Cheney, for even considering it. Paul Nitze, one of the principal architects of containing the Soviet Union by nuclear deterrence, went even further. He argued in a Washington Post article in 1994 that it...
Read More
HQAB7NMWUAA1gSk
Jan ObergTFF director ☮️ When this morning – August 19, 2026 – I saw the above new US Trump map, I came to think of Frank Zappa, The Mothers of Invention, who said that politics is the entertainment division of the Military-Industrial Complex. That formulation beats many academic analyses – as you will have understood […]
21b7244b-c83e-46c1-ba23-556b21b9a0a8_1536x1024
A Civilizational Interpretation of the West’s Body Politic Pascal Lottaz Associate professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto and TFF Board member August 25, 2026 “How do we explain the self-defeating and self-harming policies of Western states? Europe seems to be happily deindustrializing, the US proxy war in Ukraine is killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) […]
Imagen-thumbnail-The-Transnational-1
LONDON – Many of the great and the good have dismissed the utility of nuclear weapons as well as finding the idea of their use morally indefensible but still they exist in enormous numbers in the arsenals of the great powers. Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara and Secretary of State Dean Rusk both came to be convinced during their tenure in the Kennedy administration that their use was “unthinkable”. President George H.W. Bush has written that in private he ruled out a nuclear response during the 1991 Gulf War although in public his Administration did not. General Colin Powell, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his autobiography recalls chiding his boss, Dick Cheney, for even considering it. Paul Nitze, one of the principal architects of containing the Soviet Union by nuclear deterrence, went even further. He argued in a Washington Post article in 1994 that it...
Screenshot-2026-08-22-011310
August 24, 2026 Lena Petrova & Jan Oberg I am truly happy and honoured to have been invited by Lena to her unique channel, World Affairs In Context where she has over 600,000 subscribers. She covers a very wide range of global themes, based not least on her own deep and broad knowledge of economics. I want […]
Logo-Transnational
Greenland – the world’s largest island, a continent of its own with only 57.000 inhabitants. I visited it for the first time in May 2005. I flew across the inland ice to Nuuk, the tiny capital with some 14.000 inhabitants. I was overwhelmed by the pride and kindness of everyone I met as well as by the unique natural beauty. Unfortunately, due to weather conditions during my ten-day stay I could get nowhere else but Nuuk. Fortunately, however, among those I met was Gitte Arvegaard, a Danish lawyer and negotiator employed by the local government, Greenland Home Rule. She turned out to be an enthusiastic photographer with a lot of pictures taken during various trips around Greenland. So this Greeland series is the result of our cooperative effort. We both hope you enjoy it and are stimulated to visit Greenland – about which you may read more here. Finally, if you want to...
p_mccartney_poem
 Jan Oberg’s storyof how he met Sir Paul Liverpool – where else to meet Paul McCartney? Paul’s old class mate and TFF Associate, Jonathan Power introduced me to Paul McCartney in Liverpool at an informal reception. It was held at what used to be their school, now the Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts and we were there to celebrate that Jonathan had written Amnesty International’s 40th Anniversary book. This happy event for “righting wrongs and writing songs” gave me an opportunity to meet Paul and tell him about TFF and get straight to the matter: would he consider making a donation in support of our work for peace? While I was probably the only one with such a wish that day, I was certainly not the only one who wanted to shake hands and talk with him. In the last minutes before Paul was to leave, Jonathan brought us together and we got about three...