John F. Copper: Why the US is provoking war with China in Taiwan

John F. Copper

December 15th, 2022

US intelligence agencies do not say China is preparing for an invasion of Taiwan. Why? Taiwan’s role as the ‘reverse great wall’ in US containment policy and Xi’s 2049 reunification deadline are missing from Western narratives. They explain why the US is provoking war with China in Taiwan and why China refuses to be provoked.

Originally posted by Pearls and Irritations on October 26th, 2022

The US-Taiwan relationship is a long-discussed subject. Now it is even more a topic in the news with experts and government officials speaking of it being an immediate cause of a war between the United States and China.

There are two issues, however, considering their importance, are not a central part of the narrative about US Taiwan policy but should be.

One is Taiwan’s strategic importance to the United States. The other is China’s President Xi Jinping’s declaring a far-off deadline, 2049, to resolve Taiwan’s “unacceptable separation.”

Taiwan’s strategic importance might focus on its geopolitical value to America. It does sometimes; but it should more often. As Robert Kaplan, a geopolitics savant points out in his writings, Taiwan is a vital link in the “Great Wall in reverse,” a chain of islands that extend from Japan south to Indonesia that hems in the Chinese navy—Beijing’s favourite in terms of its pursuit of becoming a world power.

Specifically, if China were to recover Taiwan it would have possession of submarine bases on its east coast. Whereupon China’s submarine fleet would be able to quickly enter the deep waters of the Pacific Ocean and sail undetected (not being seen by satellite or aircraft reconnaissance) to the US west coast and strike Los Angeles and other cities there with nuclear tipped missiles. This would profoundly alter the strategic balance between the two countries.

Amplifying the salience of this, Kaplan compares China’s recovery of Taiwan to the Battle of Wounded Knee in 1890 when the US army defeated the Sioux Indians and ended the Indian wars to then become a world power with imperialist and colonial motives and policies. Owning Taiwan would do the same for China, he says.

Why then doesn’t the US admit to Taiwan’s geopolitical relevance? President Biden, or whoever makes policies in his name, wants to portray Taiwan as one of the main actors in Washington’s narrative that America is engaged in an existential war with China that pits the democracies of the world against the authoritarian countries. Taiwan is a democracy; China isn’t.

The other matter is that President Xi has set a deadline for the recovery of Taiwan, which might be seen as an ultimatum and a prelude for war. However, that date is 2049, the centennial of the Communists defeating Chiang Kai-shek’s forces and the establishment of the People’s Republic in 1949, It is so far into the future as to be seen as meaningless. Or at least China’s current leaders will have been in retirement for some time and won’t have to worry about their pledge.

One might interpret this to mean that China is not seriously considering invading Taiwan tomorrow or the next day as some have suggested. Rather it means China’s leaders espouse a long-term policy to unify Taiwan with China.

The latter makes perfect sense if one takes cognisance of the fact that China’s plan to ultimately be the world’s eminent power is to reconstruct the global system into one whose leadership is based on financial and science power instead of the current one based on military power (which many pundits such as Richard Haass, president of fhe Council on Foreign Relations and elder statesman Henry Kissinger say is antiquated and is falling apart). Incidentally, many observers also think the China’s system is morally preferred to the Western system.

Anyway, the fact is the United States is militarily stronger than China, spending three times what China allocates to its defences and having access, some say to 800 foreign bases. China would lose a war with the United States. Yet China is fast catching up and can wait for the day when it has a military that is ahead of the US. By the way, who says Chinese are not patient?

Further proof comes from what former president Jimmy Carter has to say… That China is not a warmonger country as evidenced by the fact it has not been at war for 40 years (and its troops do not have much combat experience) while America has been at war someplace almost all of the time (in pointless and wasteful conflicts but its military is combat-ready; yet the American people are not).

One must also be careful not to believe what the Western media says about the situation: China is likely to invade Taiwan because everyone’s attention is on Ukraine. In fact, China sees it as a Russian blunder as much as an opportunity. President Biden’s pullout from Afghanistan sullied America’s reputation as a global power to such a degree it is disabled. This may well pass, especially if the Republicans win the next two elections. America’s military’s lacks training in essential matters owing to its preoccupation with pronouns and wokeness. Public opinion in the US hints strongly this will change. US intelligence agencies do not say China is preparing for an invasion of Taiwan. If true, they would likely say so. Finally, President Xi, speaking at the recently concluded 20th Chinese Communist Party conference, said emphatically China would recover Taiwan; but he did not set an earlier deadline. He also said the Chinese people demand it, which is vague and not a call to arms.

In conclusion, there is a lot of talk, cum bloviating, about Taiwan. It contributes to the scare of war to help the Biden administration justify expanding government power and authority. However, it looks different when seeing two matters that are ignored but shouldn’t be.

Please support TFF’s work for peace through research and public education. We are all-volunteer, people-financed and do not accept money from governments or corporations. In other words, one of the very last free research think tanks in this world – and for a noble purpose: Peace by peaceful – intelligent – means. It is fast, easy and secure. Click here. Thanks!

[paypal-donation]

John F. Copper is the Stanley J. Buckman Professor (emeritus) of International Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee. He is the author of more than thirty-five books on Taiwan and U.S. China/Taiwan policy, including the seventh edition of Taiwan: Nation-State or Province? (Routledge) just over a year ago and Taiwan’s Politics in Action (World Scientific) early in 2021.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Jan Oberg, TFF director April 9, 2026 I was recently invited to have a good, long talk about the world – and, of course, about peace too – with Boris Malagurski on his Weight of Chains Channel on YouTube. It was a real joy and seems to have been greatly appreciated by the viewers too. Mr Malagurski and I shall of course be grateful if you share this conversation in your circles – of course, only if you like what you see and hear  And remember that this one – like hundreds of others with TFF Associates – can be enjoyed at our TFF Video Collection.
This is not another geopolitical commentary on the Arctic. It is a visionary peace proposal that can save the region from militarised rivalry and ecological ruin. A blueprint for shared security, sustainable development, and human dignity — benefitting Greenland, the Arctic, and the rest of us. Jan Oberg TFF director Lund, Sweden, February 17, 2026 I. Four Principles for a New Arctic Vision The Arctic is often framed as a cold arena of rivalry — a place where great powers test each other’s resolve. But this worldview is outdated, unimaginative, and ultimately self‑defeating. The Arctic is not a vacuum waiting to be militarised; it is a living region, a climate stabiliser, and a cultural homeland whose future will shape the future of humanity. If we begin from that understanding, a far more rational Arctic order becomes possible — one that is peaceful, cooperative, and centred on the people who actually live there. This vision rests...
PART 2 — Diplomacy, Law and Nonviolent Power By Jan ObergTFF co-founder and director January 26, 2026 This is the second of four TFF-created idea portfolios designed to curb the global reach of the United States and, in both the short and long term, help catalyse a worldwide nonviolent resistance to what many observers describe as the Trump administration’s uniquely confrontational, destructive and world-threatening policies. These portfolios outline what governments and citizens across the world can do through dynamic diplomacy, creative initiatives, and strictly nonviolent means. They are typical TFF works in that we do not only tell what the problem is and how bad it will go – as 90+% of all commentators, experts and scholars do – we tell what we think can be done, inviting you to think of what you think you can do. It seems painfully clear to me that the current political dynamics in Washington increasingly resemble the most dangerous...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...