PressInfo #193 – PressInfo 193 Give Burundi’s Peace a Chance

A donors’ conference, co-sponsered by the Burundian government, the Belgian government and UNDP will be held in Brussels January 12-13, 2004. This PressInfo offers a perspective on its urgency. See also TFF’s new Burundi Forum.


Imagine for a moment that politics is about goodness and generosity. Where could a few million dollars of government aid and a few civil society organisations – guaranteed – win the hearts of extremely poor millions who want peace and already work hard to achieve it after 10 years of war and genocide?

The answer is Burundi, the heart-shaped country in the heart of Africa. Burundi makes a good story from Africa. But what does the world know about Burundi, its problems and struggles?

Burundi’s tough reality

Here are the basic facts. Burundi’s population is about 7 million and it is number 171 out of the 175 countries on the UNDP’s human development index. Their life expectancy is 41 years. 69 per cent of its people are under-nourished. It has 290,000 internally displaced citizens and there are about 800,000 Burundian refugees outside of the country waiting to get home. The GNP per capita is US $145. While half of the people are illiterate, 50 per cent of primary school kids don’t have access to schools and those who have lack some 80-100 per cent of the textbooks needed.

There is one (1) doctor per 100,000 citizens and one single psychiatrist in the whole country. The health system has collapsed and 70 per cent of its hospital beds are occupied by AIDS patients. 40,000 die annually because of AIDS; that is13 times the victims of September 11. There are a quarter of a million AIDS orphans in the country. So, humanists of the world, Burundi is your best choice this year!

There is extreme poverty, rampant emotional, social and sexual violence; there is increasing corruption. There is an extremely unequal distribution of wealth and power. The infrastructure is virtually non-existent; travelling to certain provinces requires special security; there is no railway and the country does not have any national museum. And, yes, there is still some fighting because a rebel movement, said to number less than 1,000 soldiers-cum-looters, refuses to join the peace process. Burundi last hit the front pages in July 2003 when these rebels managed to launch an attack on the capital, Bujumbura, in the so-called Tutsi-Hutu ethnic conflict. It is far from only an ethnic conflict – if at all – but that’s the generalised interpretation by people who are more interested in violence and war than in the underlying conflicts.

The good story – wanting peace

So much for the sad facts about Burundi. Fortunately, there is a much better story to tell from this former “Oasis of Peace” in Africa: it could become such an oasis again. The good news is that, with the exception of the mentioned few rebel fighters, all parties are now inside the framework of the Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement and they all participate in the peace process, the second-last rebel movement joining in August 2003.

Burundi is one of few countries in the world that has a minister for peace and reconciliation, and a minister for human rights and good governance, the latter a former rebel leader. There is an African peace-monitoring mission that works. Any visitor who meets politicians and intellectuals will find out that there is a surprising number of open-minded, simply good-hearted, women and men who have both good visions and good will.

Irrespective of all this, the peace process will invariably fail without an international community – EU countries in particular – that shows similar qualities: good hearts, vision and the will to do something. Burundi does not have diamonds or oil – perhaps a good thing so it won’t be the object of some “humanitarian” intervention – but it has a good climate, excellent natural conditions for feeding its people and, being exceptionally beautiful, an indisputable potential for tourism.

Most important of all, the people are now completely exhausted – neither Hutus (84 percent) nor Tutsis (15 per cent) nor Twas (1 per cent) want one day more of fighting. That is a marked difference from when I visited Burundi four years ago. The Burundians have learned the hard way that war, genocide and other violence only brought grief and devastation on everybody except for a few corrupted politicians and looters (who, as usual, also got rich here through ill-conceived international sanctions hitting only the wrong people). Few people could work with deeper conviction for peace and development after the hell on earth they have gone through.

How to survive 2004 and beyond?

So, what are the immediate challenges in 2004? There is demobilisation and a military that will have to find civilian jobs. During the war years, the army swelled to perhaps 60,000 soldiers; it has to transform into a unified military of maximum 20,000. It desperately needs to secure that demobilised soldiers, returning refugees and the rest of the people have something to eat, something to do, schools to send their kids to and somewhere to get medical treatment.

In 11 months from now, the present transitional government and parliament shall be replaced by new ones through elections. I ask how on earth they will be able to carry through fair, honest and reliable elections on top of all the other problems and without a census and election law. Top level politicians tell me that the country simply must, that it is stipulated in the Arusha Agreement and that even bad elections are better than none.

Another huge issue is that of reconciliation and trust-building. Some tell me that the country should establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission like that in South Africa. Some tell me that Burundi is different and special and that such a process could do more harm than good. Also, there were simply too many who committed crimes to be given legal processes in court rooms – not to mention that the legal system itself is in ruins. Thus, the only thing that is likely to work constructively seems to be informal, everyday people-to-people, municipality-to-municipality reconciliation and forgiveness.

I met many peace heroes in Burundi. There are excellent, visionary intellectuals; there are devoted, hard-working NGOs; there is an emerging civil society gaining strength and trying with inhumanly small resources to anchor and solidify the elite and the party system’s peace agreement among the millions of destitute. It is common knowledge that this peace agreement leaves very much to be desired. And it is common recognition that there is no faster or better road to the future.

Can the madness return? Where to turn when you want peace aid?

But I am afraid that, if we don’t assist Burundi now, many will be so frustrated that they will likely return to the mountains and resume their fighting and their genocidal policies. That does not have to happen.

If a new genocide happens, you will hear about it. But you won’t hear that we – the “international community” – caused it by not doing what easily could be done. Such is the angle on Africa. It is not fair, it is not objective journalism, and it certainly does not increase the willingness of governments and development agencies to get involved when time is ripe. And the time is ripe now! Not helping Burundi through 2004 could be a recipe for a new hell in Africa.

When countries have natural resources we want or when extremist groups inside a country take to violent methods, various groups in the international community stand ready to provide arms, ammunition, mercenaries, propaganda and media attention. But to whom can countries turn for empathy, assistance and compassion when they struggle to get out of war and maldevelopment? Where shall they turn to obtain peace assistance on their own terms?

Get the priorities right and help make Burundi an Oasis of Peace

Here is an African country that ought to hit our headlines for its struggle towards development and peace. What human folly and what wrong priorities in our world that powerful countries in Europe and the US itself try to create impossible peace where they are not wanted and ignore the places where peace is perfectly possible! The Bush administration spends US $1 billion a week in Iraq without, it seems, winning the hearts of the 24 million Iraqis.

The fact is that it would be very cheap to help Burundi. The UN Consolidated Appeals Process, CAP, calls for US $72 million to meet the immediate humanitarian needs for 2004. The country has an accumulated debt of US $1.2 billion. In global terms, this is peanuts! Of course, true development over the next decade would require much more aid and investment. But the first precondition is that people survive and kids get to school. They will if we help them.

Let’s reward the Burundians because they turned to peace, give them that humanitarian assistance and cancel that debt in full. That would be conflict-management, violence prevention and humanitarianism in one. It would show others that peace pays.

Here is a good story in the making! This is the place where you can win 7 million hearts. This is where people and governments who are serious about their wish to see a better world have a golden opportunity. Let’s work with the Burundians to re-create their desired Oasis of Peace!

© TFF 2004

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.

Recent Articles

Burundi – hopp om fred Burundi, var är det nu det ligger? Det är nånting med Hutsier och Tutuer – eller vad de nu heter – som mördar varandra med machete-knivar, nånting med fattigdom, korruption, militärdiktatur, nöd och elände? Det hopplösa, mörka Afrika i ett bananskal, eller hur? Tja. Jag har precis varit där. Det ligger naturligtvis någonting i det. Och det finns en del orsaker till att vi inte ser mycket om landet i massmedia. En av dem är att det inte försiggår något folkmord just nu, ingen naturkatastrofer, ingen kupp. Det finns ingen misslyckad FN-mission, USA och EU har få intressen, Madeleine Halfbright har inte sagt något om det nyss, NATO:s Solana ser inte bombningar i Burundi som viktiga för firandet av alliansens 50-årsdag i april. För en tid sedan då 50 människor mördades strömmade hundratals journalister med CNN i spetsen till Burundi…men för att snabbt försvinna till Kongo...
Burundi – håb forude Burundi, hvor er det nu det ligger? Det er noget med Hutsier og Tutuer – eller hvad de nu hedder – der laver folkemord med machete-knive på hinanden, noget med fattigdom, korruption, militærdiktatur, nød og elendighed? Det håbløse, mørke Afrika i en bananskal, ikke? Tjah. Jeg har lige været der. Der er selvfølgelig noget om snakken. Der er en del årsager til at man ikke hører særligt meget om livet i dette lille land. En af dem er at der ikke foregår noget folkemord for tiden, ingen naturkatastrofer, intet kup. Der er ingen mislykket FN-mission, USA og EU har ingen interesser, Madeleine Halfbright har ikke sagt noget om det, NATO’s Solana ser ikke bombinger i Burundi som afgørende forud for alliancens 50årsdag. For nogen tid siden da et halvt hundrede mennesker var blevet dræbt valfartede hundreder af journalister med CNN i spidsen dertil . . . men...
Rambouillet (Rambo-Yeah) og Rashid Vi skriver fredag den 19. januar. For få dage siden kom jeg hjem fra små tre uger i Skopje, Beograd og Kosovo. Min analyse og min intuition siger mig dét, jeg ikke vil høre: bombningerne nærmer sig. Det var 34. besøg siden 1991. Jeg er delvist uddannet i Dubrovnik, fra 1974. Jeg kan ikke slippe det. Det er altså også mit land, der atter trues af den kulturkreds, jeg tilhører. Radmila og Peca i Beograd, venner siden 1974, intellektuelle der har valgt ikke at forlade landet og netop har sagt nej til et ophold i udlandet. Datteren Anja på 9 skal vokse op hér. "Jeg rejste ned nu," siger jeg, "fordi der enten ville falde bomber eller blive en eller anden slags ‘forhandling’ og jeg vil være hér hvis I blir bombet, for jeg skammer mig over hvad Danmark og andre lande gør." Hun får tårer...

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Burundi – hopp om fred Burundi, var är det nu det ligger? Det är nånting med Hutsier och Tutuer – eller vad de nu heter – som mördar varandra med machete-knivar, nånting med fattigdom, korruption, militärdiktatur, nöd och elände? Det hopplösa, mörka Afrika i ett bananskal, eller hur? Tja. Jag har precis varit där. Det ligger naturligtvis någonting i det. Och det finns en del orsaker till att vi inte ser mycket om landet i massmedia. En av dem är att det inte försiggår något folkmord just nu, ingen naturkatastrofer, ingen kupp. Det finns ingen misslyckad FN-mission, USA och EU har få intressen, Madeleine Halfbright har inte sagt något om det nyss, NATO:s Solana ser inte bombningar i Burundi som viktiga för firandet av alliansens 50-årsdag i april. För en tid sedan då 50 människor mördades strömmade hundratals journalister med CNN i spetsen till Burundi…men för att snabbt försvinna till Kongo...
Burundi – håb forude Burundi, hvor er det nu det ligger? Det er noget med Hutsier og Tutuer – eller hvad de nu hedder – der laver folkemord med machete-knive på hinanden, noget med fattigdom, korruption, militærdiktatur, nød og elendighed? Det håbløse, mørke Afrika i en bananskal, ikke? Tjah. Jeg har lige været der. Der er selvfølgelig noget om snakken. Der er en del årsager til at man ikke hører særligt meget om livet i dette lille land. En af dem er at der ikke foregår noget folkemord for tiden, ingen naturkatastrofer, intet kup. Der er ingen mislykket FN-mission, USA og EU har ingen interesser, Madeleine Halfbright har ikke sagt noget om det, NATO’s Solana ser ikke bombinger i Burundi som afgørende forud for alliancens 50årsdag. For nogen tid siden da et halvt hundrede mennesker var blevet dræbt valfartede hundreder af journalister med CNN i spidsen dertil . . . men...
Rambouillet (Rambo-Yeah) og Rashid Vi skriver fredag den 19. januar. For få dage siden kom jeg hjem fra små tre uger i Skopje, Beograd og Kosovo. Min analyse og min intuition siger mig dét, jeg ikke vil høre: bombningerne nærmer sig. Det var 34. besøg siden 1991. Jeg er delvist uddannet i Dubrovnik, fra 1974. Jeg kan ikke slippe det. Det er altså også mit land, der atter trues af den kulturkreds, jeg tilhører. Radmila og Peca i Beograd, venner siden 1974, intellektuelle der har valgt ikke at forlade landet og netop har sagt nej til et ophold i udlandet. Datteren Anja på 9 skal vokse op hér. "Jeg rejste ned nu," siger jeg, "fordi der enten ville falde bomber eller blive en eller anden slags ‘forhandling’ og jeg vil være hér hvis I blir bombet, for jeg skammer mig over hvad Danmark og andre lande gør." Hun får tårer...
Read More
Burundi – hopp om fred Burundi, var är det nu det ligger? Det är nånting med Hutsier och Tutuer – eller vad de nu heter – som mördar varandra med machete-knivar, nånting med fattigdom, korruption, militärdiktatur, nöd och elände? Det hopplösa, mörka Afrika i ett bananskal, eller hur? Tja. Jag har precis varit där. Det ligger naturligtvis någonting i det. Och det finns en del orsaker till att vi inte ser mycket om landet i massmedia. En av dem är att det inte försiggår något folkmord just nu, ingen naturkatastrofer, ingen kupp. Det finns ingen misslyckad FN-mission, USA och EU har få intressen, Madeleine Halfbright har inte sagt något om det nyss, NATO:s Solana ser inte bombningar i Burundi som viktiga för firandet av alliansens 50-årsdag i april. För en tid sedan då 50 människor mördades strömmade hundratals journalister med CNN i spetsen till Burundi…men för att snabbt försvinna till Kongo...
Burundi – håb forude Burundi, hvor er det nu det ligger? Det er noget med Hutsier og Tutuer – eller hvad de nu hedder – der laver folkemord med machete-knive på hinanden, noget med fattigdom, korruption, militærdiktatur, nød og elendighed? Det håbløse, mørke Afrika i en bananskal, ikke? Tjah. Jeg har lige været der. Der er selvfølgelig noget om snakken. Der er en del årsager til at man ikke hører særligt meget om livet i dette lille land. En af dem er at der ikke foregår noget folkemord for tiden, ingen naturkatastrofer, intet kup. Der er ingen mislykket FN-mission, USA og EU har ingen interesser, Madeleine Halfbright har ikke sagt noget om det, NATO’s Solana ser ikke bombinger i Burundi som afgørende forud for alliancens 50årsdag. For nogen tid siden da et halvt hundrede mennesker var blevet dræbt valfartede hundreder af journalister med CNN i spidsen dertil . . . men...
Rambouillet (Rambo-Yeah) og Rashid Vi skriver fredag den 19. januar. For få dage siden kom jeg hjem fra små tre uger i Skopje, Beograd og Kosovo. Min analyse og min intuition siger mig dét, jeg ikke vil høre: bombningerne nærmer sig. Det var 34. besøg siden 1991. Jeg er delvist uddannet i Dubrovnik, fra 1974. Jeg kan ikke slippe det. Det er altså også mit land, der atter trues af den kulturkreds, jeg tilhører. Radmila og Peca i Beograd, venner siden 1974, intellektuelle der har valgt ikke at forlade landet og netop har sagt nej til et ophold i udlandet. Datteren Anja på 9 skal vokse op hér. "Jeg rejste ned nu," siger jeg, "fordi der enten ville falde bomber eller blive en eller anden slags ‘forhandling’ og jeg vil være hér hvis I blir bombet, for jeg skammer mig over hvad Danmark og andre lande gør." Hun får tårer...
Konflikthåndtering – den ny kolde krig Det internationale såkaldte “samfund” er tilstede som fredsskabere i snart sagt hver eneste konflikt og krig med sine diplomater, soldater, genopbygningshjælp, monitorer, jurister, ambassadører, fredsbevarere, mæglere, politi, eksperter, forhandlere og med agenter, satelliter, hangarfartøjer og kampfly på alert. Fredsforstyrrende fraktioner skal bringes til det berømte forhandlingsbord omkring hvilket de under det internationale samfunds pres skal sige ja til fredsplaner, Den generelle, tidstypiske mediedækning af politiske konflikter og krige befæster mere eller mindre bevidst to dybt misvisende, men funktionelle, opfattelser. (A) Konflikter handler om gode versus mindre gode aktører og konfliktløsning er følgelig et spørgsmål om at straffe de onde og belønne de gode, ofrene. (B) Verden er opdelt i to parter, ja der er to verdener: På den ene side er der "fredsforstyrrerne" – slyngelstater, hitleristiske diktatorer, forfejlede stater, primitive og onde aktører, terrorister, folk der ikke forstår andet end store bogstaver og bomber...
Försoningens tid Att förlåta någon innebär att man accepterar den som handlat felaktigt och som ångrar det. Försoning är ett klarläggande och en accept av det som hänt, ett viljesmässigt beslut om att komma vidare och se framåt. Vi kan förlåta en annan människa hans eller hennes gärningar och därmed erbjuda en ny start. Vi försonas med fakta och med den skyldige och eventuellt också med att vi själva kan ha varit en medverkande orsak till att det gick som det gick. Förlåtelse och försoning handlar emellertid inte om att glömma. Ett par av mina kväkarvänner miste för några år sedan sin son och blivande svärdotter i en bilolycka, ett resultat av en annan bilists helt oansvariga manöver. Det var viktigt för dem att träffa den människa som förvållat dem så stor smärta. Straffet i sig var inte viktigt för dem utan de sade till honom: "vi kan förlåta Dig...
Ett expanderande NATO är konfliktbevarande Nato expanderar i en värld där de samlade militärutgifterna motsvarar årsinkomsten för jordens 49 procent fattigaste, skriver fredsforskaren Jan Øberg. Satsningen på Nato:s utvidgning går ut på att kämpa mot fiktiva hot och skapar exakt det man säger sig vilja undvika, ekonomisk kris, instabilitet och nya hot. Nato expanderar. De globala militära utgifterna har årligen fallit med några få procent. Men den nya teknologins slagkraft ökar. Kärnvapenindustrins forskare hotas inte av arbetslöshet. Enbart USA har en militär budget på drygt 250 miljarder dollar och världens samlade militärutgifter motsvarar årsinkomsten för de 49 procent fattigaste på klotet. Tyskland expanderar. En gång i tiden förstod man att ett förenat Tyskland måste vara neutralt. Men Gorbatjov, som gav Sovjetunionens och Warszawapaktens upplösning till Västvärlden i tron att han skulle få någonting i gengäld, serverade också ett förenat Tyskland till Nato på en silverbricka. Delvis kärnvapen-nedrustning följde liksom ryska...