What happened at Pakrac?

the working title of a research program
that started in February 1997

We have been witnessing the creation of new ethnic boundaries or maybe reactivating of existing ethnic boundaries in former Yugoslavia. But we do not know when and why some people started to treat their former friends and neighbours as enemies and why that led to atrocities, totally destroyed societies and genocide.

In order to find out why, we have to trace the process and the people involved in it. It seems to be a good way to choose one geographically defined place and try to find out what has happened to the people living there, also in their minds. Our assumption is that an understanding of what happened in Pakrac in Western Slavonia, Croatia, will offer useful insights into what happened elsewhere in the former Yugoslavia, and, for that matter, into other parts of the world where ethnic hostilities act to draw bounderies between peoples who had little or no sense of those differences before.

The principal goals of the program is to learn about:

– the traumatic effects of the hostilities that have swept across the area, and

– the process that takes place when people of different nationalities who have lived in relative harmony for many years are suddenly invited to regard their neighbours as enemies, if not as members of a different species altogether.

In this program we will study what happened to people during the social breakdown, in what way they changed their attitudes, their self-image and their views of others and how they reacted to the events they were exposed to.

We have chosen the town of Pakrac in Western Slavonia, Croatia for several reasons. Some people claim that the wars in former Yugoslavia started in Pakrac and then refer to events in spring 1991 when Serb and Croat militiamen exchanged automatic gunfire as both sought to take control of the police station. The event as such did not start the war but the reports from the event started a chain reaction. In Belgrade the news reported that six Serbs had been killed and other media reported as many as 30 people killed, but probably no one was killed at all . Hostile events were reported early in this area and Pakrac were heavy damaged by the war, the front went straight through the town. Pakrac was then divided by a cease-fire line into a Croatian and a Serbian part controlled by the United Nations and a UN checkpoint.

Pakrac is also interesting because of the composition of its population. Before the war in 1991, Pakrac had approximately 8.500 inhabitants of whom roughly as many were Serbs as Croats, and as many as 18 % of other nationalities (Hungarians, Czechs and Italians). Mixed marriages were common, mostly between a Croat and a Serb. They all lived together in this small town surrounded by villages that were dominated by one of the ethnic groups. The demarcation line divided not only the town, it also separated families, friends and relatives from each other. This lasted for four years until May 1995 when the Croatian Army by force took control of the whole area and the UN mission dissolved.

Pakrac has also been exposed to a lot of interests from outsiders. The UN (UNPROFOR, United Nations Protection Force) was deployed here as well as several non-governmental organizations; as many as 500 young volunteers from all over Europe have been working here for shorter or longer periods. All these people who stayed in the area during the years of conflict have so much knowledge and information that ought to be gathered and analysed.

Members of this research project also know quite a lot about Pakrac and we have a good network in the area, which makes it easier to start up the project and get support from the authorities and others.

We believe it is important to understand the downward spiral along which people descend into bitterness and hatred and even slaughter in order to help those who have been caught up in that spiral to find the way back. One needs to know the downward path, that is, before one can help people retrace it.

The lessons of Pakrac might prove very instructive in other parts of the world, not only where efforts are being made to repair the damage done to the tissues of social life by outbursts of ethnic hostility, but where efforts are being made to avoid that kind of eruption in the first place.

The principal investigators in this project are:

Kai Eriksson, Ph D, Professor of Sociology, Yale University, Connecticut, U S A.

Eric Markusen, Ph D, Professor of Sociology and Social Work, South West State University, Minnesota, U S A.

Kerstin Schultz, Bachelor of Science in Social Work, member of the TFF Conflict-Mitigation Team (Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research), Lund, Sweden and research fellow at COPRI, Copenhagen Peace Research Institute, Copenhagen.

Eriksson has been studying human responses to disasters and the nature of ethnicity for many years, and in connection with those interests has visited Pakrac on four occasions.

Markusen has written extensively on genocide and is by now a seasoned veteran of travel in the former Yugoslavia.

Schultz has, as a member of TFF Conflict-Mitigation Team, travelled frequently in former Yugoslavia since 1991 and written and given lectures about the former Yugoslavia in general and about Western Slavonia in particular.

Feasibility project

In a first feasibility project Eric Markusen and Kerstin Schultz went to Zagreb, Pakrac and Vukovar in February – March 1997. The primary goals of that project was to:

a) form an opinion of the feasibility of the research program;

b) inform the authorities of Pakrac about our project and plans for the future,

c) trace the Serbs from Pakrac who now live in the neighbouring region of Eastern Slavonia, and set up a network in order to keep in contact if they will flee again,

d) conduct some interviews.

————————————————————————

The report of that journey is available from Kerstin Schultz, whose e-mail address is: kerstin.schultz@mailbox.swipnet.se or kschultz@copri.dk

The project started in February 1997 with funding from Copenhagen Peace Research Institute, COPRI, Denmark.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...