Romanian and U.S. militarism increases insecurity in South Eastern Europa and the Black Sea Region

”Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”

President Dwight Eisenhower

The agreement recently signed between the government of Romania and the government of the United States represents one of the greatest political failures in Romania in recent decades. It is part of a continuing policy rooted in the absence of responsible politics and a reliance on increasing militarism and aggressive military engagement in a broader US dependent alliance.

Romania is the first post-Warsaw pact country to establish permanent US military bases in its territory, contributing to increased insecurity and militarization of the Black Sea region. This step is part of the policies of Romanian governments over the past 14 years – regardless of political party – which have led to the promotion of increased militarization, participation in three foreign wars and accompanying occupation, and misuse of national resources for excessive and unnecessary military expenditures.

US military deployment in Romania will include use of the Mihail Kogalniceanu airbase in southern Romania as the centre for its Eastern European Task Force (EATF). US forces will also use the Smardan training range, Babadag training area and Cincu training range. This is not the first time Romania has cooperated with the US military. In 2003 American soldiers used the Mihail Kogalniceanu air base to transfer US soldiers and military property into Iraq during the early stage of the Iraq war. Romania is also one of the few countries in the world which has increased its military presence in the occupation and war in Iraq, rather than calling for their withdrawal. Romania has 860 troops in the US occupation of Iraq, and additional troops in Afghanistan. Romania is also widely believed within Europe, internationally, and by Human Rights Watch, to be hosting a secret prison at the Mihail Kogalniceanu airbase as part of the United States global prison terror network, involving wide-spread illegal abduction and use of torture.

Given Romania’s own historical experiences of brutal and violent repression and use of torture against citizens by an authoritarian regime, Romania’s believed participation in this US run torture network, if true, is one of the greatest betrayals by the regime to the cause of human rights, democracy and freedom in Romania and internationally.

Active and engaged discussion of these issues, by all levels of Romanian society, media, academics and politicians is essential, whatever one’s position. Dialogue and investigation of alternatives and appropriate policies are vital. The participation of Romania as a host of foreign military bases and participant in wars which escalate and increase violence and threat of terrorism world-wide represents an extreme negative choice in the range of options facing the country. The measly economic benefit which will be brought in by US bases – a core focus of nearly all media reporting on the issue – will not equal the economic loss to Romania through misappropriation of revenue for increased military expenditures and the Bechtel highway in the country, nor the damage done by Romania for prospects for greater democratization and economic, social and political cooperation in Europe, South Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region. Romania today is becoming a country rapidly losing the respect of its own citizens and the world for the foreign policy roles it is playing.

In 1968 when the Soviet military illegally invaded Czechoslovakia, Romania had the courage and integrity to refuse to take part, and provided a refuge and asylum to Czechoslovak dissidents. This represented a high-point in Romania’s refusal to be involved in illegal acts of aggression and war, even when under significant pressure, building upon its past positive experience in the inter-war period in promoting disarmament and non-aggression. In 2002 Romania was one of the first countries to ask to be allowed to participate in the illegal war and occupation in Iraq which has so far contributed to the deaths of more than 100,000 Iraqi citizens, and continued instability and violence in the country, including wide-spread use of torture and human rights violations by the occupying countries.

In 1958 Soviet military forces and bases were withdrawn from Romania representing a step, if only a small one, to increased independence and sovereignty for the country. In 2005, Romania has invited another foreign power to establish military bases on Romanian soil, contributing to the expansion of military bases world-wide and a failure to develop responsible, effective and practical policies to deal with the challenges and issues facing Romania and the world today. Experience from the United States global network of bases has also shown a long track record of increases in prostitution, sexual violence, and rape, bringing negative social consequences, environmental pollution and human rights violations.

Concrete Proposals and Therapy

These policies and their importance to the country mean that they belong in the democratic space of decision making where all citizens have a right and responsibility to take part. Media, academics, NGOs, writers, politicians and all citizens in the country have a vital role to play in engendering a vibrant, constructive discussion of the challenges and issues facing Romania, domestically and internationally, and developing effective policies and responses which address the needs of Romania and its citizens and contribute to the promotion of democracy, human rights, and the effective and peaceful transformation of conflicts in the region and internationally.

The following are a number of proposals which represent a practical and principled alternative for Romanian foreign policy:

• Non-stationing of foreign military bases in Romania: a policy which would prevent any country from maintaining foreign military bases in Romania, including withdrawal from all treaties which allow for the positioning of foreign military bases and the use of Romanian territory and airspace for military action against other countries

• Non-participation in illegal wars and acts of aggression against foreign countries: including respect for international law and the UN charter and withdrawal of all Romanian military units and personnel participating in the US wars of occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan

• Active participation in international fora, the UN and European Union to develop effective responses and practical solutions to the challenges of war and terrorism in the world today: Romania has so far played a minimal if not totally absent role in meaningful efforts by countries internationally to develop effective responses to addressing the root causes of terrorism (state and non-state), and developing effective mechanisms and tools for the resolution of domestic and international conflicts and prevention of war. This should change, with Romania, building upon its own historical experience, playing an active role in building international cooperation and alliances (with governments and citizens) to promote dialogue, respect for human rights, and regional and international efforts to transform conflicts constructively and effectively through peaceful means.

• Promotion of a ‘Demilitarized Zone/Peace Zone’ in the Black Sea Region: As an example of this, Romania could pioneer a policy of constructive engagement with all countries in the Black Sea Region for the total demilitarization of this international space and the promotion of greater regional social, political and economic development and integration and creation of a Zone of Peace in the Black Sea Region.

Would you be reading this now,
if it wasn’t useful to you?
Get more quality articles in the future

• Support for the creation of a UN Commission on Peacebuilding and EU Peace Commissioner and Peacebuilding Office: Going a step further, Romania could play an active role in supporting the development of effective infrastructure and mechanisms for the peaceful resolution and transformation of conflicts within Europe and internationally

• Establish a Romanian Ministry for Peace, Civil Peace Service and national peacebuilding infrastructure: Addressing this on a domestic level and following the model now being developed throughout Europe and internationally to professionally train foreign service and civil personnel for crisis response and prevention, conflict transformation, emergency relief and humanitarian aid, and post-war and post-violence recovery and reconstruction

• Support democratization, human rights mobilization and peace work in Iraq, Afghanistan, the United States and Britain: Providing direct government-to-government, citizen-to-citizen, civil society and sectoral cooperation – including teachers, engineers, and human rights workers – to organisations, communities and citizens in these countries working to promote democratization, respect for human rights, and the transformation of conflicts within their countries and in their countries’ engagement internationally.

• Support and encourage responsible media reporting: The media has a vital role to play in ensuring that citizens have access to correct and diverse information. Citizens, academics, politicians, and NGOs should support and encourage media and journalists in Romania to critically question and investigate and provide professional and responsible reporting and coverage of diverse opinions on such important issues.

• Promote democratic discussion and involvement on these issues in Romania: Including creating citizens fora and spaces for discussing these issues, public meetings, and vibrant dialogue and sharing of opinions and perspectives, as well as direct action to promote awareness and understanding of the issues facing the country and responsible policy options and alternatives.

These are policies which, if properly discussed and brought forward, could be supported by the overwhelming majority of citizens in Romania, and earn Romania the respect of the international community.

Continuing on Romania’s current path can only lead to increased disillusionment and loss of respect for Romania as a member of the community of nations, and Romania’s continuing contribution to war crimes and crimes against humanity through participation in wars and (possible) torture networks.

Alternatives are possible. It is up to citizens, media, academics, writers, politicians and all sectors of society in Romania to discuss these issues, to explore the impacts and effects of different policies and actions, and to choose through democratic processes the policies which meet the needs of the country, and contribute to the promotion of peace, human rights, and the abolition of war and terrorism world-wide.

The challenge is there! May we have the courage to take it up.

Links and Resources

Peace Action, Training and Research Institute of Romania (PATRIR)

Foreign Policy in Focus

TRANSCEND

US Department of Peace

Ministry for peace UK

Department of Peace Canada

TFF – Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research

Conflict Prevention Partnership

Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict (GPPAC)

Z Magazine

European Peacebuilding Liaison Office

Nonviolent Peaceforce

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Will the Bush regime “prevail” and go to war? Or will it listen to citizens – and quite a few governments – around the world and think? Could it be that President Bush is projecting his own subconscious and fears when he tells Saddam that “the game is over”? Could it be that he and the apparently desperate people around him are beginning to feel that their bullying and vision-less game – not with the world but against it – could spell the end of their regime and the U.S. empire? Political fundamentalism The Bush regime is politically fundamentalist: we are right, they are wrong. It’s based on the flawed assumption that policies can be based on a) dictating to friends and foes alike that they are either with us/U.S. or against us/U.S., and b) ignoring every type of listening, consulting and consensus-building policies with rightfully concerned parties, including its closest friends. So, regrettable...
Prefatory Note: Below is a Letter to Members of Congress with an initial group of signatories; there are many more that have been gathered but not listed here. The letter was drafted by myself (Richard Falk) in collaboration with Noam Chomsky and Daniel Ellsberg. If you wish to add your signature, please send your name and affiliation to Vida Samiian, vidasamiian@gmail.com who helped compose the original text, and now with the logistics of the initiative. If you agree with the argument, please do join us by adding your name. The Letter was composed prior to the Iranian missile attacks on two American military bases in Iraq and before Trump made his formal statement the following day, January 8th.   Although his statement is being read in many ways, including the suggestion that Trump’s intention was to step back from the brink of a devastating war, I listened to Trump from...
By David Kline A year ago, Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi (sha-oh-me) had fallen from the world’s most valuable unicorn to a “unicorpse.” Sales plunged in 2016, pushing the company from first to fifth place among China’s smartphone makers. No firm had ever come back from a wound that severe in the trench warfare of the global smartphone business. Today, Xiaomi is being called a “Chinese phoenix.” The company has grown so fast in the past year that research firm Strategy Analytics says Xiaomi could overtake Oppo, Huawei, and Apple in the next year to become the world’s second-largest smartphone vendor, behind Samsung. Executives are reportedly considering an IPO in 2018, which could be among the highest-valued ever. Via wired.com The comeback has made Xiaomi a poster child for China’s entrepreneurial dynamism. More than 10,000 new businesses are started every day in China – that’s seven Chinese startups born each minute....

Recent Articles

Till Sofias huvudsida
OK, Trump did not get it. But he got a full endorsement of a possible future US regime change in Venezuela. And that is what Ms Machado has advocated. On October 10, 2025, the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded its Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition figure María Corina Machado. The citation praised her “tireless work promoting democratic rights.” But Ms Machado has openly called for U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, stating on CBS: “The only way to stop the suppression is by force—U.S. force.” She or her party has received funding from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a U.S. government-backed body known as a CIA front organisation and for supporting regime-change operations worldwide. And in 2018, she sent a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, asking him to use “force and influence” to help dismantle Venezuela’s government—citing alleged ties to terrorism, Iran and narcotrafficking. This year’s NATO Norwegian prize...
PRESS RELEASE – 6 OCTOBER 2025 LAY DOWN YOUR ARMSPEACE PRIZE FOR 2025 is awarded Francesca Albanese The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories – as the person who, in accordance with Alfred Nobel’s will, has “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations and for the abolition or reduction of standing armies as well as for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Francesca Albanese has forcefully and unwaveringly worked against Israel’s full-scale war on the occupied Palestinian territories, in particular Israel´s ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people. She has confronted Israel’s systematic war crimes and crimes against humanity in a truly global outreach. Further, she has brought governments, international organisations and people’s groups together to underline the responsibility of the world at large to act and to stop arming, enabling, and profiting from Israel’s ongoing criminal actions. But first of all, Albanese...

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Till Sofias huvudsida
OK, Trump did not get it. But he got a full endorsement of a possible future US regime change in Venezuela. And that is what Ms Machado has advocated. On October 10, 2025, the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded its Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition figure María Corina Machado. The citation praised her “tireless work promoting democratic rights.” But Ms Machado has openly called for U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, stating on CBS: “The only way to stop the suppression is by force—U.S. force.” She or her party has received funding from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a U.S. government-backed body known as a CIA front organisation and for supporting regime-change operations worldwide. And in 2018, she sent a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, asking him to use “force and influence” to help dismantle Venezuela’s government—citing alleged ties to terrorism, Iran and narcotrafficking. This year’s NATO Norwegian prize...
PRESS RELEASE – 6 OCTOBER 2025 LAY DOWN YOUR ARMSPEACE PRIZE FOR 2025 is awarded Francesca Albanese The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories – as the person who, in accordance with Alfred Nobel’s will, has “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations and for the abolition or reduction of standing armies as well as for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Francesca Albanese has forcefully and unwaveringly worked against Israel’s full-scale war on the occupied Palestinian territories, in particular Israel´s ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people. She has confronted Israel’s systematic war crimes and crimes against humanity in a truly global outreach. Further, she has brought governments, international organisations and people’s groups together to underline the responsibility of the world at large to act and to stop arming, enabling, and profiting from Israel’s ongoing criminal actions. But first of all, Albanese...
Read More
Till Sofias huvudsida
BlackNobel
OK, Trump did not get it. But he got a full endorsement of a possible future US regime change in Venezuela. And that is what Ms Machado has advocated. On October 10, 2025, the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded its Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition figure María Corina Machado. The citation praised her “tireless work promoting democratic rights.” But Ms Machado has openly called for U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, stating on CBS: “The only way to stop the suppression is by force—U.S. force.” She or her party has received funding from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a U.S. government-backed body known as a CIA front organisation and for supporting regime-change operations worldwide. And in 2018, she sent a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, asking him to use “force and influence” to help dismantle Venezuela’s government—citing alleged ties to terrorism, Iran and narcotrafficking. This year’s NATO Norwegian prize...
Screenshot-2025-10-08-163458
PRESS RELEASE – 6 OCTOBER 2025 LAY DOWN YOUR ARMSPEACE PRIZE FOR 2025 is awarded Francesca Albanese The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories – as the person who, in accordance with Alfred Nobel’s will, has “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations and for the abolition or reduction of standing armies as well as for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Francesca Albanese has forcefully and unwaveringly worked against Israel’s full-scale war on the occupied Palestinian territories, in particular Israel´s ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people. She has confronted Israel’s systematic war crimes and crimes against humanity in a truly global outreach. Further, she has brought governments, international organisations and people’s groups together to underline the responsibility of the world at large to act and to stop arming, enabling, and profiting from Israel’s ongoing criminal actions. But first of all, Albanese...
Copilot_20251003_003414
Officially, the drones were not identified. By simply thinking critically – which journalists and selected experts no longer do – there may be a good reason for that. And this article will never be mentioned in Denmark… Drones over Denmark. No damage. No trace. No answers. Yet the headlines scream “Russian threat,” and Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen speaks with a certainty that defies logic: “We don’t know they were Russian—but we know Russia is the biggest threat to Europe.” It could be nobody else – unless you make an interest analysis which I did two days ago. This is not security policy. It’s theatre. And the audience is being played. Let’s rewind. These drones—unphotographed, untracked, unclaimed—appear and vanish like ghosts. Airports shut down. Panic spreads. Military budgets swell. And the narrative hardens: Russia is behind it. But what if that’s not just wrong but deliberately misleading? Here’s a hypothesis for...
Screenshot-2025-09-30-231913-1
And why the world, especially the EU, must now declare itself independent of the United States. UN’s 80th anniversary This year, the United Nations celebrates the 80th anniversary of its founding. The UN was formed after the scourge of the Second World War, in which 70 to 85 million people were killed and many countries were destroyed. That war came on the heels of the First World War, which also killed between 15 and 22 million people. After the Second World War, especially after the use of nuclear weapons by the United States, which marked a turning point in the history of warfare that could result in the end of civilisation as we know it, humanity decided to move away from the era of empires and big power politics and usher in a new era of peace, freedom and cooperation. These were the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. The United States...
DRONE
Drones over Nordic airports. No damage. No trace. No answers. Most assume Russia—but what if that’s not so? Why is there so much we are not told? This article explores the strategic ambiguity behind recent drone incursions and asks: Who else might benefit from sending drones into NATO airspace? From Ukraine’s surprising drone supremacy to Russia’s possible signalling, the silence itself may be the loudest message. These are the kinds of questions decent, intelligent investigative journalists and commentators could easily research. Why don’t they? Did you, dear reader, know or think of this? That the most powerful weapon in today’s conflicts might be the one that leaves no trace – and no answers. Just enough fear to justify the next move? Recently, drones have repeatedly appeared over Nordic airports and near some military facilities. They cause no damage – for which reason the designation “hybrid attack” is misleading but serves a purpose. These...