Britain, which created the Israeli-Palestinian Mess, will Finally Recognize Palestinian State

Professor emeritus, TFF Associate

Oxford (Special to Informed Comment; Feature)

The dam has burst. Netanyahu and his far-right regime have gone too far. Public pressure on politicians in Europe and many other countries has become irresistible, forcing them to change course. Most countries, 147 of the UN’s 193 members, have formally recognized a Palestinian state, and last week, France pledged to do so at the UN meeting in September. Fourteen nations, including Canada, New Zealand and Australia, join France in a push to recognize a Palestinian state.

The British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, one of Israel’s staunchest allies who even refused to condemn the Israeli blockade of food, water, medicine and fuel to the Palestinians after the terrible events of 7^th October, has buckled under the pressure of public opinion. More than 255 MPs of all parties signed a letter addressed to the prime minister in which they urged him to recognize Palestine as a sovereign state. The list included more than a third of the cabinet, including the deputy prime minister, the foreign secretary, the home secretary and many other senior ministers.

The result was an emergency cabinet meeting on Tuesday 29^th July and the dramatic announcement that the UK will recognize Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September. On the same day, as he returned from his meetings with President Donald Trump in Scotland, in a speech at 10 Downing Street, Starmer said Britain will recognize a Palestinian state in September. He said the recognition will happen unless the Israeli government takes “substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza”, including a ceasefire and a commitment to a long-term peace process.

Although the statement is weak, hedged with certain conditions and far too late, it is better late than never. For a country that is mainly responsible for the creation of the state of Israel with the Balfour Declaration, at a time when it had no jurisdiction over Palestine and when the world was decades away from the Holocaust, the promise to recognize Palestine is a very significant and welcome move.

Shortly after Starmer announced his plan in London, his foreign secretary did the same before the UN. British Foreign Secretary David Lamy said: “Let me be clear: the Netanyahu government’s rejection of the two-state solution is wrong. It’s wrong morally and it’s wrong strategically. And so it is with the hand of history on our shoulders that his majesty’s government therefore intends to recognize the state of Palestine when the UN General Assembly gathers in September.”

The global revulsion at the Israeli genocide, and especially the photos of hundreds of emaciated babies and children dying of starvation in front of the eyes of their helpless mothers, brought to our television sets daily, has forced even the hardest politicians to buckle under the pressure.

On 24^th July, in a post on X, French President Emmanuel Macron said France would officially recognize a Palestinian state in September.

Continue reading the original at Juan Cole’s “Informed Comment”:

Britain, which created the Israeli-Palestinian Mess, will Finally Recognize Palestinian State

Former Professor and Dean of the Faculty of Languages, University of Isfahan; former lecturer at Cambridge, Harvard and Oxford universities; retired Editor for Middle East and North Africa, BBC Monitoring.

Genocide Middle East conflict formation TFF Blog TFF global posts 2025 TFF PressInfo

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

EU security and defence

Denmark, Drones & Deception: Europe’s Staged Panic Over False Flag Non-Russian Drones?

Officially, the drones were not identified. By simply thinking critically – which journalists and selected experts no longer do – there may be a good reason for that. And this article will never be mentioned in Denmark… Drones over Denmark. No damage. No trace. No answers. Yet the headlines scream “Russian threat,” and Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen speaks with a certainty that defies logic: “We don’t know they were Russian—but we know Russia is the biggest threat to Europe.” It could be nobody else – unless you make an interest analysis which I did two days ago. This is not security policy. It’s theatre. And the audience is being played. Let’s rewind. These drones—unphotographed, untracked, unclaimed—appear and vanish like ghosts. Airports shut down. Panic spreads. Military budgets swell. And the narrative hardens: Russia is behind it. But what if that’s not just wrong but deliberately misleading? Here’s a hypothesis for...

TFF Blog

President Trump’s insulting and demeaning speech at the UNGA

And why the world, especially the EU, must now declare itself independent of the United States. UN’s 80th anniversary This year, the United Nations celebrates the 80th anniversary of its founding. The UN was formed after the scourge of the Second World War, in which 70 to 85 million people were killed and many countries were destroyed. That war came on the heels of the First World War, which also killed between 15 and 22 million people. After the Second World War, especially after the use of nuclear weapons by the United States, which marked a turning point in the history of warfare that could result in the end of civilisation as we know it, humanity decided to move away from the era of empires and big power politics and usher in a new era of peace, freedom and cooperation. These were the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. The United States...

Cold war

Don’t be fooled: Others Could Have More Interest in Sending Drones to the Nordic Countries than Russia

Drones over Nordic airports. No damage. No trace. No answers. Most assume Russia—but what if that’s not so? Why is there so much we are not told? This article explores the strategic ambiguity behind recent drone incursions and asks: Who else might benefit from sending drones into NATO airspace? From Ukraine’s surprising drone supremacy to Russia’s possible signalling, the silence itself may be the loudest message. These are the kinds of questions decent, intelligent investigative journalists and commentators could easily research. Why don’t they? Did you, dear reader, know or think of this? That the most powerful weapon in today’s conflicts might be the one that leaves no trace – and no answers. Just enough fear to justify the next move? Recently, drones have repeatedly appeared over Nordic airports and near some military facilities. They cause no damage – for which reason the designation “hybrid attack” is misleading but serves a purpose. These...

Recent Articles

Blog

Sofia fick sitt namn

Till Sofias huvudsida

Featured

The Nobel ‘Peace’ Committe Awards US Military Regime Change Policies

OK, Trump did not get it. But he got a full endorsement of a possible future US regime change in Venezuela. And that is what Ms Machado has advocated. On October 10, 2025, the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded its Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition figure María Corina Machado. The citation praised her “tireless work promoting democratic rights.” But Ms Machado has openly called for U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, stating on CBS: “The only way to stop the suppression is by force—U.S. force.” She or her party has received funding from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a U.S. government-backed body known as a CIA front organisation and for supporting regime-change operations worldwide. And in 2018, she sent a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, asking him to use “force and influence” to help dismantle Venezuela’s government—citing alleged ties to terrorism, Iran and narcotrafficking. This year’s NATO Norwegian prize...

Ethics and values

The Lay Down Your Arms Peace Prize for 2025 to Francesca Albanese

PRESS RELEASE – 6 OCTOBER 2025 LAY DOWN YOUR ARMSPEACE PRIZE FOR 2025 is awarded Francesca Albanese The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories – as the person who, in accordance with Alfred Nobel’s will, has “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations and for the abolition or reduction of standing armies as well as for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Francesca Albanese has forcefully and unwaveringly worked against Israel’s full-scale war on the occupied Palestinian territories, in particular Israel´s ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people. She has confronted Israel’s systematic war crimes and crimes against humanity in a truly global outreach. Further, she has brought governments, international organisations and people’s groups together to underline the responsibility of the world at large to act and to stop arming, enabling, and profiting from Israel’s ongoing criminal actions. But first of all, Albanese...