War Criminals Are on the Run

LONDON – Remember the summer of ’98? In the sweltering, torpid heat of a Roman august, charged with exhaust fumes, the international community gave its overwhelming approval to the establishment of an International Criminal Court that will enable those accused of “crimes against humanity” to be tried and, if convicted, sentenced. Only seven nations opposed or abstained from the motion, including Israel, China, India and the U.S.A. where the Pentagon had successfully waged bureaucratic guerrilla war to undermine the initially sympathetic stance of President Bill Clinton.

Two years on we can now see what an epochal event that was. In a the stroke of 120 pens it changed the climate on political thuggery. After numerous half-starts and false starts ever since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials that convicted the war criminals of the Second World War, the world at last had agreed en masse a common set of understandings and a statute on what constitutes a war criminal and how, once arrested, due process should proceed. Of course, the momentum had been gathering speed for half a dozen years- hence the ad hoc war crimes tribunals for ex-Yugoslavia and Rwanda- but that summer was the watershed, when the cold rain of judicial sense took over from personal writ, and the dam burst. In two years prosecution has followed prosecution, even though it will be another couple of years before legislatures have acquiesced in ratification and the Court itself is up and running. Meanwhile, the world waits for its most important putative, would-be member, the U.S. to make up its mind what to do.

Two months after the Rome conference the former Chilean strongman, Augustino Pinochet, was arrested in London when, in the early hours of the morning, Scotland Yard detectives sealed off the clinic where he was recuperating from a back operation. The next day, Mrs Margaret Thatcher, the former prime minister, attacked the police publicly for disturbing the rest of a “sick and frail old man”. The arrest, indeed, was a momentous event in the human rights struggle. The brilliant British lawyer, Geoffrey Robertson in his book ,”Crimes Against Humanity” wrote observantly, “The great play of sovereignty, with all its pomp and panoply, can now been seen for what it hides: a posturing troupe of human actors who when off stage are sometimes prone to rape the chorus.” For the first time in a high court anywhere it was decided that sovereign immunity must not be allowed to become sovereign impunity. For the Law Lords’ ruling we have to thank most of the nations of the world, including Chile and Thatcher’s Britain, who in the late 1980s and 1990s put their signatures to the UN Convention Against Torture and thus laid the legal basis in British jurisprudence.

And now last week the justices of the Chilean Supreme Court in effect concurred with their London colleagues and decided to lift Pinochet’s immunity from prosecution, an immunity he had longed assumed was copper-bottomed in Chile, making the fatal mistake of all tyrants in believing his popularity and his ability to cow people would last for ever.

What a year 2000 has been and there are still four and a half months to go! Earlier in the year a congressional commission in Brazil filed a petition to indict Alfredo Stroessner, the most long-lasting dictator of the twentieth century until he was overthrown in 1989, who now lives in exile in Brasilia. In Argentina, which briefly jailed its military junta before pardoning them in 1990, the former dictator Jorge Videla and eight other leaders of the “dirty war”, in which dissidents were thrown out of helicopters over the sea, are back under arrest. Today they are facing charges that they stole babies (for adoption) from female political prisoners. In Uruguay a new commission has been formed to investigate the whereabouts of people who disappeared under the country’s former military government.

In Africa, at the beginning of the year human rights groups and individuals who say they were tortured during the rule of Hissene Habre, the former dictator of Chad, announced they were intending to prosecute him in Senegal where Mr Habre lives in exile. According to Human Rights Watch, during Habre’s eight year rule, when he was vigorously supported as a Cold War friend by the U.S. and France, his secret police killed tens of thousands of people and tortured as many as two hundred thousand out of a total population of only six million. (In March, however, there was a change of government in Senegal and, at least for now, the charges have been withdrawn.) On Monday of this week the UN Security Council voted to establish a special war crimes court to deal with the accusations of atrocities in Sierra Leone. This suggests, whatever reservations the U.S., China and Russia have about a fully-fledged international court, they will at least agree to deal with the worst cases on an ad hoc basis. That is an important development.

What happens next? The indications are that Nato is about to drop its reserve and arrest Radovan Karadzic, the indicted former head of the Bosnian Serbs and his military commander, Ratko Mladic. In the last year, eight indicted war criminals have been arrested and handed over to the International War Crimes Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in The Hague and in April Nato troops arrested Momcilo Krajisnik, a right-hand man to Mr Karadzic. If the arrest does go ahead as expected Western leaders will find it difficult to parley away the indictment of the supreme Serb leader, Slobodan Milosevic, in any political deal for the ending of hostilities.

The sum of all this activity of the last two years is to effectively lock up former dictators in their places of refuge. They dare not venture far from where they think they are secure. Last year the former Ethiopian strongman, Mengistu Haile Mariam, suddenly left Zimbabwe where he had been given shelter for North Korea, one of the few countries that will not consider a UN demand for extradition. Also in late August last year, Suharto, the former Indonesian dictator cancelled the trip he makes annually to Germany for medical treatment.

Being big and bad is no longer enough to strut your stuff. The net is finally starting to close on those who do such evil. “They can run but they can’t hide” as the old American heavy-weight boxer, Joe Louis used to say. This is momentous sort of progress. It may not totally change the world, but it is not leaving it as we found it either. One day, it is possible to believe, we might have a world of laws not of men.

I can be reached by phone on: +44 385 351172 or by e-mail: JonatPower@aol.com

Foreign affairs columnist, film-maker and author

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Peace is promoted by constructive proposals and dialogue Four preceding PressInfos have expressed concern over — and criticised — the ongoing, militarisation of the EU. Some will say: but there are no alternatives. We believe that there are always alternatives, that democracies are characterised by alternatives and choice, and that openly discussed alternatives will improve the quality and legitimacy of society’s decision–making. In addition, it is an intellectual and moral challenge to not only criticise but also be constructive. If we only tell people that we think they are wrong, they are not likely to listen. However, if we say: what are your views on this set of ideas and steps? — we may sometimes engage them in dialogue and sow a seed. Most people in power circles live their daily lives in in a time frame and a social space where certain ideas, viewpoints and concepts are just not...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
Av FRANK SØHOLM GREVIL 16 augusti 2004  Vi er nu nået til tredje akt i det absurde teaterstykke, der i analogi med de store skueprocesser i Moskva 1936-38 er blevet døbt ‘Grevil-sagen’. Første akt bestod i min anonyme fremlæggelse af egenhændigt nedklassificerede rapporter i Berlingske Tidende i februar og marts. Andet akt udgjordes af min fremtræden med navn og billede i Information i april samt den efterfølgende mediestorm, som uden min direkte medvirken kostede en forsvarsminister taburetten samt en sigtelse for brud på tavshedspligten. Tredje akt bliver en retssag, hvor jeg står tiltalt for at have overtrådt straffelovens bestemmelser om uberettiget videregivelse eller udnyttelse af fortrolige oplysninger. Statsanklageren har ovenikøbet valgt at påberåbe sig særligt skærpende omstændigheder. Da jeg aldrig har modtaget betaling for at stille rapporterne til rådighed eller lade mig interviewe, må det skærpende bestå i, at “videregivelsen eller udnyttelsen er sket under sådanne omstændigheder, at det påfører...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...