Living with genocide

TFF board member

If we’re being honest, with few exceptions, most of us have stopped counting the days since the genocide in Gaza began. We’ve also lost track of the death toll—especially the number of children. We can offer excuses: being overwhelmed with our personal and professional lives, the sheer intensity and frequency of global crises (Ukraine, trade wars, or the unbearable ease with which Trump is reshaping the world in his own image). But the truth is, sporadic mass protests in some Western cities, citizen petitions, intellectuals’ appeals, and podcast appearances do little to change the reality—or rather, the nightmare—of the people in Palestine. You’ll often read a post saying that eight billion people condemn the genocide that keeps going and going, seemingly with no end in sight. We blame ourselves for our helplessness, our despair, and our rage—at least those of us who refuse to forget the images that should haunt us all if we are truly human.

It’s true that in many countries, including my own, protests are virtually nonexistent. Mainstream media coverage is dry, and therefore inhumane. There are no televised debates, and even podcasts are more popular when they deal with party quarrels and everyday political gossip. The military-industrial complex metastasized long ago—encompassing education, media, and even entertainment. We still don’t know whether we’re trapped in Orwell’s 1984 or Huxley’s Brave New World. People retreat into forgetfulness, unwilling or unable to face the fact that this is worse than the Holocaust—because now we can livestream the screams of children, the amputations, the deaths from hunger and thirst. No one is stopping us from watching—we just choose to preserve our personal peace and moral self-image by liking a post or a podcast.

Where do we even begin? How can we help the Palestinians? I listen to Vijay Prashad speak passionately about the Palestinians’ “stubbornness” as a sign of their defiance and love for the little that remains unseized by the occupier. I have seen him trying to bring the topic of Gaza and genocide into a Chinese media outlet, calling for the world’s other powers to stand more firmly against the terror carried out by a small state like Israel (of course backed by the U.S. and the EU—but that too is just an excuse). The world we wish to see—anti-hegemonic, just, and multipolar—feels more distant with each death by bomb or starvation in Gaza.

What am I trying to say? That we already live with Orwellian doublethink: we believe a new and just world is being born, while at the same time mourning dead children and helpless civilians, accepting that no one—not even Trump, that moron—can or will stop it. I believe most people around the world oppose child killing and ethnic cleansing through forced displacement. And yet, that same majority is powerless—not just against Israel and its genocide, but also against their own governments. We are all hostages, prisoners of inhuman leaders posing as statesmen. We can’t even change our own backyards—how are we to change the world?

Let me confess: after one kakistocracy was replaced by another in our elections, and the new prime minister pledged loyalty to both Trump and now Starmer (who, mind you, promised £5 billion?!), it became clear to everyone that we are a Western colony with a broken compass. Nothing functions in this country—not the judiciary, not the healthcare system, not public services or education. A state that can’t put its own house in order cannot possibly be virtuous or capable enough to help the people of Gaza. And in the end, everyone mourns only their own dead, worries only about their own “national interest.” Everyone feels like an island, not part of humanity. There is no solidarity. Even less internationalism. As for justice—what was that again?

And when I write here, or anywhere else, I do it for myself. To keep my sanity, to stop myself from dying of shame, rage, and sorrow. I follow many people here, and some follow me—so what? We console ourselves that we are not alone. I belong to a few peace networks and activist groups, but we’re still powerless. Perhaps we’ll need to wake up and organize a resistance—not just against genocide but against our own mental and physical captivity. But it must begin at home. The Palestinians must forgive us, but our governments don’t vote at the UN, don’t declare boycotts against Israel, don’t support lawsuits at international courts—even though they are obliged to. In my country, international law is enshrined as a fundamental value of the constitutional order. So what? We’re best friends with Israel, with the U.S., with the UK, and we adore the EU—even though it treats us worse than orphans, like an amorphous mass without identity. I’m sure it’s the same in many countries. That’s why this is a collective sin of all UN member states—against one of the most long-suffering peoples in the history of humankind. Shame on all of us. A deep and unforgettable shame.

I write this not out of a belief that it will change the world — but to keep a piece of myself from going silent. To hold onto something human in a time that punishes empathy, that rewards distance, that teaches us to scroll past suffering as though it were scenery.

Perhaps this is all that remains to us: to witness. To refuse the comfort of forgetting. To let the cries of the wounded settle where they belong — not just on our screens, but beneath our ribs.

Once, Maxim Gorky said: Man — how proud that sounds.
But today, the word rings hollow, as if spat from the mouth of a ghost.
What is pride in a species that watches genocide in real time and turns away?

And yet — and yet.
In a world grown quiet with resignation, perhaps the most subversive act is to still be haunted. To still be ashamed.
To still believe that somewhere, even in this bruised and broken condition we call humanity, a different future might take root — if only we remember how to feel.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.

TFF on Substack

Discover more from TFF Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg.

Most Popular

Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Read More
Screenshot-2026-05-15-103534
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...
Screenshot-2026-05-12-104023
Lena Petrova of “World Affairs In Context” with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube wanted to explore what a peace researcher like me has to say about, among other things, the First and the Second Cold War and why eethics has disappeared from politics. I am particularly happy about this conversation that also yielded an amazing number of very appreciative comments on YouTube. No doubt, people are longing for alternatives, including peace perspectives.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (2)
The MIMAC – Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – drives the world’s rampant militarism and wars without end. Here is a short reflection of how it works against all interests of humanity. #5 deals with why there is no real enemy or threat images/analysis. It’s all ex-post constructions. And, btw, theTFF Peace Pulse is now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551 (1)
Jan Oberg, TFF director April 28, 2026 In this third TFF Peace Pulse, I make the important distinction between the violence and the conflict that violence is a symptom of. If you want peace, focus on the underlying conflict because that is the key to resolution, peacemaking, and a better future for the parties. The West is obsessed with violence, just look around you – and 90+ per cent of the public debate is about military issues and other violence – totally wasted for peace. These Peace Pulses will only be published here a few times. You will also not find them on YouTube and Vimeo because both platforms have blocked TFF and me; you know, peace is dangerous these days. Most TFF’s videos since 2007 are now on Rumble.
Screenshot-2026-04-13-154551
In contrast to most, we’ll bring alternatives, solutions, hope and strategies for a better future. Times are dangerous, yes, but that only intensifies the need for constructive thinking and action! Jan Oberg, TFF director April 13, 2026 The new TFF Peace Pulse uses video messages in a new way: Max 3-5-minute-long comments, ideas or perhaps mini-lectures, all about peace – positive peace. We launch them today on April 13, 2026 with a carefully crafted visual aesthetic fitting the content. We hope to publish them regularly from now on. We launch Peace Pulse (PP) – for a number of reasons. The world is in chaos, and there are countless reasons to feel concerned, frustrated, even angry. The atmosphere is saturated with doom and gloom, with negative energy and rear‑mirror thinking, while vision, imagination, alternatives, strategies and genuine future‑mindedness remain in short supply. And without them, we simply can’t save the world. Looking at problems from a hundred angles will...
IMG_5165 (1)
PART II — Publishing Peace in a System That Prioritises Militarism Jan Oberg, TFF director April 10, 2026 How TFF Maintains a Daily Voice in a Digital World Built for Noise This article is part of the series “TFF at 40″ and it invites you to learn about Four Decades of Publishing Peace. It takes a look at how a small, people‑financed peace foundation has communicated across four generations of technology — from wax stencils and fax machines to mass email and Substack — and why TFF continues to publish every single day in a system that rewards noise, conflict, and militarism. ◆ What it means to publish peace every single day in a digital system built for 24/7 news and other noise, confrontation, and militarism. How TFF’s independence, continuity, and global readership defy algorithms, donor cycles, and Western media censorhip — and why the Majority World keeps listening. When the...